• lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Wtf, I never would have expected this level of resistance. What’s the catch, fear of intentional reprisals?

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They pitch their product as ethical. Go ahead, ask it about Israel committing genocide in Gaza and see how much it’ll gaslight you.

      Optics, that’s all they’re going for.

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They’re getting far more press than they ever would have had the capitulated like the other companies. Now they get to frame themselves as the “good guys”. They’ll end up doing (more of) the evil shit soon enough, but they just had a huge marketing coup. Smart play by one of the biggest grifters, bravo.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I imagine partly liability concerns, partly protecting their reputation.

      Basically they don’t want their technology being used for something it’s not ready for, something going badly wrong, and them getting the blame.