A sprawling Chinese influence operation — accidentally revealed by a Chinese law enforcement official’s use of ChatGPT — focused on intimidating Chinese dissidents abroad, including by impersonating US immigration officials, according to a new report from ChatGPT-maker OpenAI.
The initial allegations came from a Western-funded NGO report and were then amplified across U.S.-aligned media and political channels(Radio Free Asia). Official investigations did not substantiate claims of criminal law-enforcement activity. For example, authorities in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada stated they found no evidence of illegal policing operations, though concerns were raised about registration and transparency.
So not really a good reason to believe some nefarious global intimidation ring. You should probably read things before you link them.
No that’s a border dispute. Pretty much every country has them. And it’s completely unrelated to the point at hand about a global intimidation ring targeting individuals. Nice try with the false equivalence tho 2 or 3 more debate bro tactics and you might catch me out on some asinine technicality so you can declare yourself winner despite being factually wrong.
Maybe because it’s true…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_police_overseas_service_stations
The initial allegations came from a Western-funded NGO report and were then amplified across U.S.-aligned media and political channels(Radio Free Asia). Official investigations did not substantiate claims of criminal law-enforcement activity. For example, authorities in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada stated they found no evidence of illegal policing operations, though concerns were raised about registration and transparency.
So not really a good reason to believe some nefarious global intimidation ring. You should probably read things before you link them.
What kind of strawman is this? You can intimidate people without doing it the obvious illegal way.
And then, you cherry pick some countries…
You know that you can just accept negative facts about China although you are on an ml instance??
If you look through my profile you’ll see I do this often. But this bullshit about global intimidation is not a fact, it’s a fantasy.
I picked those countries because specifically they have laws making intimidation a crime and they found no evidence.
Let me guess… What China is doing in the South China see is also no intimidation tactic…
No that’s a border dispute. Pretty much every country has them. And it’s completely unrelated to the point at hand about a global intimidation ring targeting individuals. Nice try with the false equivalence tho 2 or 3 more debate bro tactics and you might catch me out on some asinine technicality so you can declare yourself winner despite being factually wrong.