• jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The issue with doing this under oath is that if any evidence comes out to the contrary it’s an easy conviction. Not that he hasn’t weasled around lying under oath before, but it is higher stakes than just making a public statement.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        ??

        It either means he legitimately didn’t know anything or that he doesn’t think there is any evidence to support he did know/did anything. I’m pretty sure if they had anything concrete on him, the Trump admin would have gone after him, simply to divert away from everything theyre doing.