cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/42694823

Trump has no power to “decree” that voters must present ID or to end mail-in balloting. But that doesn’t mean he can’t at least try both. Under the Insurrection Act or some other dusty statute, he can declare a state of emergency. Then he can decide that said state permits, nay requires, him to take extraordinary measures. On October 5, say, that might mean outlawing early voting. By October 13, it might mean no mail-in voting. By October 29, a reminder that all voters must present ID to vote. And by Sunday, November 1, two days before the election—an announcement that all these “reasonable” measures have alas failed, and he is now forced, against his will, to postpone the election.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s an extremely small cost for ensuring most important democratic process is untampered. The opposition for voter ID check is completely unreasonable

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Believing that everyone can find money for an ID is extremely privileged.

      I have had students who couldn’t put together the equivalent 15USD, without a month’s notice. In the US you have entire families being homeless, we don’t.

      • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well that’s great, since next elections are far more than one month away. You just made an argument that even poor students can afford it

        • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I also made the argument that you shouldn’t have to pay to vote, but you don’t like to respond to that. Only that you through your immense intellectual powers have found the logical loophole, that made me debate whether I should even make my comment.

          Is the age of your account an indication of your intent to troll, or do you care to explain, why it’s OK to require people to pay to vote? Not why it’s not unaffordable, but why it’s OK to require payment to vote.

    • ecvanalog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Except that it’s already secure. There are monitors, studies, and statistics to back the fact that illegally voting is a statistically nonexistent problem. The number of such cases is vanishingly small. There is no problem that needs solving here. It’s just assholes like yourself trying to impose their will on the law.