cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/42694823

Trump has no power to “decree” that voters must present ID or to end mail-in balloting. But that doesn’t mean he can’t at least try both. Under the Insurrection Act or some other dusty statute, he can declare a state of emergency. Then he can decide that said state permits, nay requires, him to take extraordinary measures. On October 5, say, that might mean outlawing early voting. By October 13, it might mean no mail-in voting. By October 29, a reminder that all voters must present ID to vote. And by Sunday, November 1, two days before the election—an announcement that all these “reasonable” measures have alas failed, and he is now forced, against his will, to postpone the election.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they don’t bother to vote it’s their choice. The requirement isn’t unreasonable in any way.

    • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      If they’re putting up barriers to selectively exclude certain voices, it becomes everyone’s problem because the outcome of the election no longer represents the will of the people.

      Even if 90% of the group that they’re trying to suppress does get an ID, and 10% doesn’t, it can be enough to swing elections, especially in a winner-takes-all system that’s in place in most of the US.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s amazing how we made it for 250 years without MAGA fixing our horribly broken system for the Sociopathic Oligarchs. It’s almost like the Founding Fathers didn’t even care about Billionaires.