It’s more logical than Linux’s version numbering system:
Does the major version number (4.x vs 5.x) mean anything?
No. The major version number is incremented when the number after the dot starts looking “too big.” There is literally no other reason.
It’s logical if Linus has some numbers autism
minecraft being on 1.21.11 (i think)
with the current team of devs who’s ethos seems to be to never touch the already well established gameplay features there will never be a minecraft 2.0
the entire philosophy of development for that game would need to change for that to happen
If there ever is a “Minecraft 2.0,” they would absolutely continue developing Minecraft 1.xx in parallel.
Honestly, props to them. They could make a huge amount of money by just moving over to a 2.0 and forcing a billion people around the world to buy the new version (and you know those people would buy it), but they aren’t doing that.
Minecraft recently changed its versioning scheme so the next release will be Minecraft 26.
Actually, Minecraft 26 comes out this year. They dropped the “1.” and bumped the sub-version from 21 to 26 to match the year. They’ve also changed the way the new second tier works to be related to the quarter-year.
26.1 is due next month.
So yeah, there’ll never be a Minecraft 2.0. The versioning no longer allows for it.
(This doesn’t rule out a game called “Minecraft II” with its own set of unrelated but identical version numbers. Minecraft II 36.1 drops in ten years. Maybe. But probably not.)
I recently realized: fuck it, just have the build date as the version: 2026.02.28.14 with the last number being the hour. I can immediately tell when something is on latest or not. You can get a little cheeky with the short year ‘26’ but that’s it. No reason to have some arbitrary numbers represent some strange philosophy behind them.
Tried it in the past but ultimately abandoned it, as then release numbers lost all added meaning. I can remember what happened in release 2.0.0 or (kinda) 3.5.0, but what the hell was release 2025.02.15? Why did it break this random function?
Can you immediately tell? Do you memorize the last day you released? Do you release daily? There’s definitely some benefit to making the version equal to the date, but you lose all the other benefits of semver (categorizing the scope of the release being the big one). That’s not a strange philosophy, it’s just being a good api provider.
You’re right. I’m looking at it through a very limited scope: nightly releases. I’ve been working with “latest” so long, I forgot actual versions exist.
Under semantic versioning, you should really be ashamed of bumping the major number, since this means you went and broke backwards compatibility in some way.
You have done something, that it’s worth breaking backwards compatibility over.
Yeah I just forgot how the old stuff worked
Except from 0.x.x to 1.0.0. That one means you’re committed to keeping the API/format stable. At least how I think about it.
Python agrees.
Sir…
Well that explains why I’m on version
0.0.7899999999998765
You need to cast that float.
7899999999998765
Even if a developer would make a commit every second, it would take 250 million years to reach version 0.0.7899999999998765
Most of the mistakes they have to fix are incorrect version numbering.
AI slop bbyyyyyyy!!!
Weak humans would use 250 million years, strong AI can slop it in 1 year.
/S
I have seen people just add '9’s to it, so to not upgrade the minor, so 2.6.997 gets 2.6.9997 and so on
Some people cannot math.
And here I was holding my breath for the legendary 0.0.7899999999998766. Thanks for ruining all my dreams.
Shame-antic versioning
Lowkey how I version number personal mini-projects and small things I roll out for my team.
I guess more like:
x… “huge new feature, scope expansion, or cool shit.”
.x. “small feature, or fixing a serious bug” …x “testing something. Didn’t work. Try again +1.”I’m not ashamed it didn’t work. I swear!
For the shame version isn’t updating the version number admitting there is new changes?
I thought the leading number was for when very large changes are made to the core software that make it unrecognizable from a previous version. Like if you changed the render engine or the user interface, or all of the network code.
Woosh
But are you proud of that large change?
If I were the author of GIMP I wouldn’t be
B’DUM’TSH
In semantic versioning the first number is for any change to a public API that is not backward compatible. It could be incredibly small, like fixing a typo, but if it changes the API your users are using in an incompatible way, you’re supposed to bump that number.
