• jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I feel like on part no one ever mentions on things like this are, how do you enforce any jurisdiction on a satellite and what it’s doing.

    The main crazy thing about a satellite data enter is you can’t confiscate it and therefore you can’t control it. Hell once it’s up there the only thing any government might be able to do is find the owner and force them to crash it (if possible).

    It in a sense sounds a bit like the wild west of the original internet. Admittedly Musk being at the forefront of it all sounds terrible, but I think there is something fascinating about an information hub that could be completely independent of any country.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure that’s the point TBH.

        Kinda scary when the context is these kinds of corporate systems, though.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, that was my point. Like all technology it has potential to liberate communications, but also enable bad actors. However, to me, it’s the biggest reason why this technology would matter at all.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      how do you enforce any jurisdiction on a satellite and what it’s doing.

      You threaten to disable it, which would be very easy give how fragile it is