Today, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn) shared his reaction with reporters following the briefing: “I’m more convinced now that this is going to be open-ended and forever.”

He added, “This feels like a multitrillion-dollar open-ended conflict with a very confusing and constantly shifting set of goals. They clearly seem fine with hard-line elements being in control of the country, because they plan to permanently run air operations in order to chase [Iran’s] missile-making capability, drone-making capability, and nuclear capabilities.”

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Supply chain. Drones are complicated pieces of equipment, they can’t possibly be manufacturing all of the components locally.

    During WWII the Allies brought the German tank corps to a halt by bombing ball bearing factories.

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Hasn’t Iran been under embargo for decades now? They must produce most of their stuff locally since it would be hard for them to import it.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I get that war interrupts supply chains, but you can’t really bomb a supply chain. So what’s the goal, some sort of hostile presence forever? Or are you saying that this might escalate into the US bombing China or Russia?

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        you can’t really bomb a supply chain

        Fuck yeah you can, hence my example of bombing ball bearing factories.

        Train lines are also a classic bombing target. Fuel production/refining/storage/transport, any kind of logistics hub, shipyards, airstrips, warehouses… all things that are difficult to hide because there’s always activity around them. Flatten them and the dependent supply chain grinds to a halt.