The feature, which is buried at the bottom of Nintendo’s patch notes, allows for boosted Switch 1 games when playing in handheld, with performance akin to playing with the console docked.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Right, because that’s everything stopped them in the past. If you can’t afford a multi-year long legal battle against some of the best lawyers in the world, it doesn’t really matter if you’re right or not, because you can’t even play the game.

    • TheOctonaut@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Dolphin has been around for literally 20 years and Nintendo have never pursued them because they follow the law. More importantly, they are non-profit.

      Taking payments to allow people to play leaked first-party titles was a very, very stupid thing to do.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        They prevented Dolphin from getting on steam (for free) a few years ago, so I certainly wouldn’t say “never.”

        • TheOctonaut@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          They didn’t ‘prevent’ anything. Ask Dolphin themselves.

          https://dolphin-emu.org/blog/2023/07/20/what-happened-to-dolphin-on-steam/

          TL;DR: Valve asked Nintendo of America’s layeers if they want it on the store and they said no. No pursuit. No DMCA. No threats. A legal opinion. Valve gave a copy of the response to Dolphin and said if they wanted it on the store they needed an agreement with Nintendo. i.e. instead of benign ignorance from Nintendo, to get a literal “emulate our games” approval from Nintendo. Dolphin wisely decided not to.

          In Nintendo’s response they mentioned Dolphin includng the Wii encryption key which if you are old like me you will remember being a meme almost 20 years ago (https://gizmodo.com/wii-officially-hacked-338713). Nintendo takes issue with how this was achieved (physically modifying the chips with a tweezers) but again, have never IIRC attempted any legal action to prevent it. So, “no we don’t approve” was always going to be the answer. Dolphin appear to have either expected Valve to risk its own position, or to slip under the radar, to distribute its software. In the end, the status quo was maintained: Valve do not publish or distribute (or prevent you installing yourself through Non-Steam-Games) Dolphin, Dolphin did not seek approval from Nintendo, Nintendo does not pursue Dolphin. Except Dolphin got a nice bit of tech news coverage 15 years after its launch and some nerd cred for kinda-not-really taking on Nintendo.

          • Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            They didn’t prevent anything, they just said no and then the thing didn’t happen because they said no and for literally no other reason. But it wasn’t Nintendo’s fault!

            • TheOctonaut@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Valve were the ones that explicitly told Dolphin that Dolphin would need to supply them (Valve) with evidence of an agreement. Nintendo would not have even been aware of it had Valve not independently reached out to them. Dolphin (wisely, again) did not contact Nintendo. “Prevent” has an actual meaning and it’s not “have a negative opinion towards”.

              I don’t know why I’m arguing with you, go argue with the Dolphin devs themselves that they are wrong about their own application.