• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    So for you the issue is that I’m not comfortable enough with child rape. Not that you’re so desensitized you think that description is somehow PG, nor the actual argument I made… just that I didn’t appreciate you included a graphic description of the internationally denounced horrific sex crimes in a discussion about a totally different meme crime.

    Yeah politics is just too soft these days.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      No I didn’t have any knowledge of you having an issue with information, you brought up that you had an issue with it, complained about it, and then said I had an issue with you having an issue.

      I’m glad your not comfortable with rape, no one should be. Discussion about rape is something that should be expected in a discussion board about a rapist though.

      If people don’t realize what these people did, they will always continue to walk free. One could say you are actually standing in the way of that witness getting justice because they came forward and put themselves out there to ensure people knew the atrocious acts that happened. And you want have people cover there ears. Making the majority unaware. Which while you were trying to have good intent, really helps protect those who performed those atrocities.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m not advocating for this to be hidden or obscured, I just didn’t appreciate having detauls about graphic child rape brought up in a largely unrelated discussion. You trying to spin that into me somehow being at fault because I’m uncomfortable with it is both insulting and wildly mischarcterizing what I said.