This seems like such a simple thing to me, and yet the US just can’t seem to get it done. What are the issues preventing this?

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is the most reasonable approach, and it meshes with medical studies about how DST affects our mental and physical health. We don’t need sunlight until 9 or 10 pm, and the sun is supposed to be approximately overhead at noon, not 1pm.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If you’re getting sunlight at 10PM, you live on the western end of your time zone. In your location during winter, the sun is overhead closer to 1pm than noon.

      Your particular jurisdiction might be better served by joining the timezone to your west.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Or more likely, you live in the northern US, or Canada. The further north, the more extreme the length of the long and short days are, which explains much of the split in whether people want to go with standard or DST when debating this.

        The idea of having narrower time zones, say by adding a new one, is an interesting idea to mitigate the large difference in how people experience the time zone based on if they are at the east or west edge. Shifting the existing ones around would only change who is affected but not how many.