With previous Rexit’s like the API debarcle etc. many users were left looking for an alternative, but with decision fatigue and bad UX etc. most did not find the Fediverse a viable option.

What needs to still improve, how can we be ready this time?

  • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think we should just hide all of that complexity and just set defaults for everything that the user can decide to change if they want.

    BlueSky has 40+ million users, and it’s also technically decentralized like the Fediverse.

    aka. you can use the eurosky.social or bluesky.social server etc.

      • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, that’s why I said it’s technically decentralized.

        They have 40 million users though, they focused on UX first, and will now hopefully not be dicks and actually become decentralized

        • rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not a chance unfortunately, bluesky doesn’t work without an all-seeing-eye that brings people the content they want. At best there will be some satellites running on atproto, fully decentralized, but the core will still be bluesky and it will still be completely centralized

      • aquovie@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s not decentralized although it tried really hard to be.

        I don’t want to google/remember the exact details but IIRC basically they run a centralized identity server that is impossible to avoid. At best, you can set up an island instance that doesn’t federate with BlueSky proper (like Truth Social vs Mastodon).