favoredponcho@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agoPlease don't delete the production DBlemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1403arrow-down14
arrow-up1399arrow-down1external-linkPlease don't delete the production DBlemmy.zipfavoredponcho@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up20·22 hours agoSomething like --dry-run there?
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up29·21 hours agodoes dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?
minus-squareMajinBlayze@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 hours agoIt can, if it’s passed through to tools without the llm meddling, but the problem is that there is typically a tool for arbitrary shell commands, and unless there’s a mechanism to dry run these, there’s no way to handle it reliably.
minus-squareInnerScientist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 hours agoAre you sure you don’t need the lube?
Something like
--dry-runthere?does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?
It can, if it’s passed through to tools without the llm meddling, but the problem is that there is typically a tool for arbitrary shell commands, and unless there’s a mechanism to dry run these, there’s no way to handle it reliably.
Are you sure you don’t need the lube?