• theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You’re just objectively wrong. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you can see their raw objective scores across numerous software engineering metrics.

    I’m a programmer that’s been in the business for decades. That doesn’t make me any more correct than you. I have seen it write some impressive things at impressive speeds. If you haven’t that’s fine. You just haven’t seen it work then. But it doesn’t matter what I have seen or what you’ve seen. What matters are data, and the data are clear when it comes to ability.

    Not ability per unit water consumed, dollar spent, or per unit power consumed, but ability nevertheless.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It does write code that usually works, but it makes absolutely rookie mistakes that are like worse than junior engineer level. If that impresses you, then so be it, but in my 28 years of writing code, I’ve never been less impressed by something with as much hype as AI agents have.