- Make laws against chatbots.
- Demand proof you are not a chatbot.
- Surveillance capitalism.
The real target here is population control.
The lawmakers, which take billionaire money by the ton, who HAVE NEVER given a shit, suddenly, NOW, they want to protect the vulnerable. Abso fucking lutely laughable on its face.
Agreed. It’s never about protection, just covert exploitation
Laws like this are great for these companies. This is how they will justify removing access to useful information and putting it behind paywalls. But oh your need a prescription so now the insurance companies are involved (spoiler: they already are) and so you don’t even have access to pay out the nose for medical information.
Then when Google search has been completely replaced with AI, you won’t even be able to search for medical information.
Healthcare companies aren’t about to provide anything for free.
Most of the medical information coming up these days is garbage and you should be going to a known, reputable site and searching their database. LLMs have been trained on absolute garbage. There is nothing of value being kept from anyone here.
LLMs and chatbots should not be giving medical advice. You are afraid of the private healthcare system, not the lack of access to the most janky bandaid fix for its failures.
Neither should Wikipedia or Google. So I guess by your logic nobody should search or learn about medical conditions on a computer.
You know damn well there’s an important difference related to the confidence of a bot that has been a key problem since this whole thing started.
The line between medical advice and personal research is pretty freaking gray, so banning medical advice. Does that also ban talking to llms about anything that is medical adjacent?
Does medical adjacent mean personal disabilities? Drug related interests? Pet health?
…etc
It’s a slippery slope and we don’t need to be sliding down it
People are so vicious over this tech they would rather have disabled poor people with cancer suffer and die under inadequate care than do anything about the inadequate care. Ban the tech, but let this all go on.
If you are perfectly able and well, you can ignore all advice that isn’t perfect.
The perspective they seem to lack is frightening. The empathy they refuse to engage is massive. This is able-ism.
Tech companies are bad, tech will cure cancer.
“Would rather have disabled people with cancer suffer and die…”
My guy, that’s not a lack of LLM access, it’s a completely fucked US healthcare system that forces people onto the internet because they can’t get what they need from the state, you goofy-ass weirdo.
Well yes of course but also restricting access to information doesn’t exactly help much either.
Fuck the hell out of this.
My brothers in christ, I’m not going to drink bleach because the chat bot tells me to. I’m trying to come up with diagnostic ideas to discuss with my doctors, and it’s invaluable for that.
People do it when a president tells them to.
If implemented, that would just ban chatbots that use large language models. It’s not a terrible idea.
What would actually happen is that so-called AI chatbot systems would try to detect if someone is from New York and then try to exclude them from receiving medical or legal advice, fail, and then get sued and then pay a small fine, over and over again forever.
This is a really bad idea.
First because healthcare is clearly being gatekept from people.
Second, because even if you go to a healthcare professional nowadays, there is no guarantee that that person is not a fucking idiot that doesn’t believe in vaccines. I can’t believe I have to actually ask people before they touch me if they believe in vaccines or not and then tell them to not come back into my room if they answer that they don’t believe in science. But that has happened and it has happened to the people I’ve taken care of and because of this now healthcare can’t be trusted.
The LLM is not any worse than that. In fact, I would say that it’s already too cautious. No way the model is ever going to tell me vaccines are bad. It’s not going to tell me to take a poison to clear Covid. It’s not going to tell me to drink bleach like the president did. It’s literally not any worse than the bullshit we are dealing with all day every fucking day.
And I’m getting to the point that if you’re a full grown human fucking being and you’re going to believe something if it tells you to drink fucking bleach or swallow a fucking lightbulb then that’s nature saying something about you.
100% fact.
Naw, completely disagree. If you had a calculator you knew was defective you would ban doctors and lawyers from using it.
You also seem to think that LLM is going to be inherently more accurate than a expert human. We can see with GrokAI how easy it is to manipulate an AI into saying racist white nationalist garbage. So we are not just trusting the technology but also a layer of unpredictable corporate meddling.
Why does the LLM recommend this drug but not the other one? We quickly see how a corporation could favor a certain medication due to behind the scene deals or even push a medication.
You can’t trust a black box you are not allowed to look into. Trust in a LLM at this point is pure folly.
Funny thing is LLMs are bad as calculators too, since I’ve seen it get simple multiplication wrong.
It’s capable of generating content, but unable to verify or know itself if it is correct. But, lot of people don’t realize that because the less they know about a subject matter the smarter it will seem to them not knowing its well…a language model. As in just outputting what can be complete gibberish.
Some of the SOTA models like gemini 3 pro are getting quite good at ballpark/estimations. I have fed it multiple complex formulas from my studies and some values. The end result is often quite close and similar in accuracy how I would do an estimation myself. (It is usually more accurate then my own ones.)
Now I don’t argue there is any consciousness or magic going on. But I think the generalization that is going on is quite something! I have trained ai models for various robot control and computer vision tasks. Compared to older machine learning approaches transformers are very impressive, computationally accessible and easy to use. (In my limited experience)
I find it okay for writing programs since you can verify it to see if the output is correct.
But, actual analysis not so much, since when verifying what comes out that its not completely reliable even for things it should be like numbers. Now numbers might be close, but still off
Abstract stuff might be fine. But, its still not something to entirely trust on analysis because of errors. There’s a lot of double checking that needs to be going on.
Hell yeah, let’s hold them accountable for disinformation. They’ll be gone completely in a matter of months.
It’s a bit different, because a search engine can give you 0 results. An AI is trained on getting the most correct answers so it always guesses, it’s the best way to score
Except for refusals, but that’s a kind of answer as well.
I think a better solution is to ban techbros from giving serious economic or cultural advice and take computers away from business majors.
Please don’t take them entirely away. Maybe just internet access? 30ish years had to do accounting by hand. In those green ledgers. It took approximately twelve times longer to do it by hand than to do it with a computer. And it made me shrimp like 5 times worse. I needed an architect’s table what angled the top of it in order to work properly but I could neither get one supplied by the employer nor afford to give one to the employer.
Not all technology is bad
found the business major!
what about a typewriter?
um, i had one. still have it in a case in the garage, next to my 1950s adding machine that sat in the corner of my cube making me look like a Real Numbers Person Tee Emm.
Oddly specific gripe, I’ll allow it.
thank you i have others in jars in the back
I don’t get how some of these tech company CEOs who came up as engineers can be pushing this bullshit. I get once the company got big they started hiring business bros. But some big companies still have CEOs that were once engineers. You’d think they would know better.
What kind of engineer? Because while the physical world, with all of its mechanical and civil and aerospace engineers, has its shit figured out with professional standards and very clearly defined responsibilities and duties, the world of social engineers, tire engineers, procurement engineers, supply chain engineers, sandwich engineers, project engineers, lead engineers, and yes, software engineers, definitely is a little too loose with any definition for me to care that these ceos were once ‘engineers.’
You can take any of these professional engineers, give them a billion dollars and they’re going to turn into total pieces of shit.
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
I don’t see how you police/enforce this. The technology is out of the bag, people will find ways to access. Do we need age/location verification for this now too? What if I’m running a local agent? I don’t agree with this.
The law would allow you to sue whoever is running the chatbot. If you run your own LLM locally and take bad advice from it, then it’s your own fault.
So who gets sued. The guy who put the chat bot on the server and is running it or the chatbot software developer themselves?
Or both?
The guy who put the chat bot on the server, and then that guy may sue the other one if applicable.
Walk me through how a company based and operating not in new york would be subject to any actions from this lawsuit.
I do agree it’s limited to a small scope of New York-based smaller LLMs, but if you read the news you know why exactly this bill occured - just now Mamdani gave up on a useless chatbot made with local budget by his predecessor Adams: https://www.thecity.nyc/2026/01/30/mamdani-unusable-ai-chatbot-budget/ It was indeed giving inaccurate legal recomendations on city’s website. I think the better result that can happen to that bill is it becoming a trend across cities and states as, I suspect, New York administration wasn’t the only one falling for this scam.
Would be nice if regular legal and health advice was in any way affordable though
You bring a regulation - can you really enforce it?
This reads as a way to protect white collar industries from the effects of AI without addressing the root problem–that AI does not actually think, and that it is little more than a meat grinder full of scraped data.
It does think, just not very logically.
To put it another way, it’s like we figured out how to give machines an intuition via Machine Learning. So you’ve got a machine with an intuition trained on all written text that is not literal gibberish, but by default all they know how to do is shoot from the hip with their intuition, and the only feedback they get for whether they said the right thing is whether the human they’re chatting with approves of what they say.
It’s a bullshitter to the extreme because that was how we built the incentive structure. And now they use the bullshitters to train better bullshitters.
Is it any surprise that business executives think that these are the ultimate in intelligence? All they do is bullshit.
In other words, Artificial Stupidity. Why is it CALLED intelligent?
Why is it CALLED intelligent?
Because it is “intelligent” by definition. You’re conflating the word with “highly intelligent” or just “smart”.
Dogs are “intelligent” but can’t they write code, but we sometimes refer to dogs as “smart”.
A flatworm has intelligence but no one would call it smart.
it had that name for a really long time
a couple decades ago, a program learning was really impressive
I remember when LISP was available for my Atari 800.
marketing
I may have become too cynical but, as is often the case when you dig deeper, this sounds like the result of lobbyists trying to protect licensing rather than people.
We can be dumb, but we’ve been doing web searches for legal and medical advice for ages because it is too damned expensive and time consuming to go to professionals for every little thing. Not to mention, doctors have so little time for you that it is hard to get them to listen to the whole story to make connections between symptoms.
The LLMs already tell you that they aren’t licensed professionals and, for many, provide citations for their sources (miles better than your typical health website).
As a personal anecdote, my son was having stomach pain but was planning to tough it out. He checked with ChatGPT and it recommended he go to the ER. He did, and if he hadn’t, he would likely be dead now. He spent 3 days in the hospital having his bowels unobstructed through a tube in his nose.
There is value in people having that kind of information at their fingertips.
Regulation is absolutely needed, but I would rather they focus on protecting us from AI being used for military purposes, mass surveillance, etc. rather than protecting citizens from ourselves.
Are you in the US? My take away here is American healthcare is bad but we’re treating the symptom not the disease.
Yeah, I’m in the US and I agree. Though it is going to take some serious change to treat the problem. In the meantime, this is at least a stopgap solution for people who don’t have a lot of options.
Wait, he thought he could sit that pain through at home? Your son is tough as nails
Yeah, he is pretty tough. I wish I could hug him, he is about a 10 hour drive from me. That tube was nightmarish from what he’s told me.
if i were his parent, i would be giving him gentle reminders to drink more water. after teasing him for eating way too much corn or broccoli or whatever bastard fiber caused his obstruction (assuming he’s in a mental place he can handle the teasing)
He’s in his 20s so he is only slightly more likely to take my advice than he was as a teenager 😆
if he’s more likely to take the advice, tell him it came from someone who has had hundreds of bowel obstructions.
Just have them add a disclaimer or have the hosts be liable for what their chatbots say, stop adding bureaucracy just asking to get selective prosecuted and abused.
Name checks out.
Section 230 of the dmca is designed to allow platforms to exist because people can say whatever the fuck they want. But nobody should make a machine that says things they can’t control, and if you do you need to be disciplined for such irresponsibility.
Sounds like a start. More is needed though.
The bill targets AI chatbots that impersonate licensed professionals — such as doctors and lawyers — and bars them from providing “substantive response, information, or advice” that would violate professional licensing laws or constitute the unauthorized practice of law.
It also mandates that chatbot owners provide “clear, conspicuous, and explicit” notice to users that they are interacting with an AI system, with the notice displayed in the same language as the chatbot and in a readable font size. However, the bill clarifies that this notice for users, which indicates that they are interacting with a non-human system does, not absolve the chatbot owners of liability.
AI in the legal field could be useful for assisting an actual legal professional in compiling precedent based against on-the-books laws, so long as it cites sources and they verify them.
In the medical field, it could be useful for spotting anomalies between multiple images such as X-rays or cross-referencing medical documents WHEN USED BY A PROFESSIONAL.
But the thing is, it should be a tool - carefully used - to enhance the existing profession, not replace actual professionals.
But the thing is, it should be a tool - carefully used - to enhance the existing profession, not replace actual professionals.
except when actually used, the professionals just take the LLM’s word as unassailable and disengage their brains. funny that
Yup, but those are the cases that make the news. There’s always gonna be some stupid/lazy ones
tell me you haven’t worked with anyone in the medical industry without telling me you haven’t worked with anyone in the medical industry
source: 20 years as a medical accountant
we don’t want the plebs getting around our carefully constructed cartels…
Isn’t this just trading one cartel for another? The difference being that doctors and lawyers can be held accountable for their errors while a LLM can’t because no one actually stands behind them.
Theoretically they can be but in practice it’s not always so easy. I prefer options. there’s already been dozens of cases of AI getting things right when Dr’s get it wrong. All trades should get the same competition.
Maybe but it’s trading one cartel for one that’s not as bad.
Which is really saying something considering how bad these companies are.
But imagine being gate kept from life because you don’t have enough money for it. Imagine going to the Doctor over and over and over again and then never be able to find fucking shit yet managing to always charge you hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of dollars every fucking time. Until finally over a decade later, one just randomly says oh you need this super simple drug To take for a week to clear it. Thousands upon thousands upon thousands of dollars years of suffering, and yeah, not one of them could figure it the fuck out? Until one doctor took one look at my skin and knew? But the others still were owed a paycheck for it? So yeah, it is trading one cartel for another but fuck the healthcare cartel. What the fuck did we expect to happen?
If you don’t save peoples lives and you don’t give them a way to find healthcare then you deserve what you fucking get and we are all going to suffer for this. We are all going to suffer for allowing these quacks all over the place. Selling bullshit all over the place. Telling us vaccines don’t work. Yeah It’s trading one for another, but at least one isn’t going to charge us a fucking car just to tell us to go fucking home and pass the dead baby by ourselves and to come back if it don’t work out so they can get another car out of me to save my life.
Yeah, I got some fucking beef with Healthcare professionals.
The idiocy you see in this thread is a result of ableism. Healthy people CANNOT understand what it means to need medical help. So much so that they want to deny tools to the very people who need them most.
Maybe. LLMs are free(ish), meanwhile a single trip to the ER can leave a person destitute. Maybe that’s not so bad (it is) if the ER visit is for something actually urgent, but somewhere between 27% and 40% of ER visits are non-urgent and most are treatable by a PCP. But… ERs have to treat you while, in the US, a primary care physician can look you right in the eyes and turn you away because you have no money.
People don’t want to admit that AI does some good because the companies that own these LLMs are as corrupt as any other and the implications of the corruption of this tech are horrifying. But for health care, including mental health, LLMs are an unexpected godsend.
Uscher-Pines, L., Pines, J., Kellermann, A., Gillen, E., & Mehrotra, A. (2013). Emergency Department Visits for Nonurgent Conditions: Systematic Literature Review. American Journal of Managed Care. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4156292/
Raven, M. C., et al. (2024). Emergency Department Visits That Could Be Managed at Other Care Sites. JAMA Network Open. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2813806
