Key Points

Walmart is rolling out digital shelf labels and expects the technology to be in all U.S. stores by year’s end. Kroger also has begun experimenting with the technology.

The nation’s largest retailer says the digital price tags help associates do their jobs better and stresses that prices on items will be exactly the same for every consumer in every store.

Some legislators are wary of the technology’s potential to be used in dynamic pricing models that disadvantage consumers, with Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) introducing a bill to ban it.

  • maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Well if you think its Walmart making people poor you’re mistaken I would say, its QE that really erodes your paycheck. The CPI then does hedonic adjustments and substitutions to mismeasure real inflation to make it seem like you’re not getting poorer.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They’re not the only one to blame, no.

      The system is propped up by everyone simultaneously. Especially when there’s people like you defending giant corporations like Walmart.

      Also I’m not American

      • maplesaga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        If the money supply grows at 8% a year and productivity barely rises that’s just raw debasement in my view, and complaining about an unchanging <4% margin of a consumer staple mainly owner by retired boomers is silly IMO.

        According to research everyone should be buying levered positions and staying 100% global equities for life, as an inflation hedge is so important in the casino we call a global economy.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Because that’s how economies of scale work; you say a bigger number happens in another process, which implies that 4% profits are actually 4% socialist.

          Man, I really didn’t think you were going for the “Walmart is actually socialist” - bit, I thought it’s beyond exaggerated comedy for me to even suggest you’d be dumb enough to argue that… yet here we are. Lol.

          You’re comparing two completely different things; profitability per dollar vs. absolute growth of business.

          • maplesaga@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ya you lost me on the socialist bit. I’m simply saying there’s so very little juice to squeeze, you’d be extremely luck to trim 1% off their price, banning credit cards at grocery store would probably be more effective.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Why are you genuinely disregarding everything I say about your points? Feels like you’re being disingenuous.

              You showcase that profits are 4%, but growth of money supply is 8%, and then heavily imply those can be directly compared, meaning that Walmart is actually losing money with 4% profits when they “should” have that number at the 8%, even when those figures don’t correlate at all.

              It’s like saying that since my shoe size is 44 that my IQ must be X or Y. Shoe size has nothing to do with IQ, even if IQ was objective and good enough to be valuable.