• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    49% reduction, customized to patient’s cancer, and $200k.

    Cancer treatment can cost a lot more, so here’s hoping.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This really puts a hole in “they aren’t curing cancer because it’s not profitable” argument. Insurance companies love cures because it’s a lot cheaper for them to pay once than for ongoing treatment, when the only thing you’re paying is the premium (and copay or whatever).

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Assuming they actually pay for treatment, which they will often try to avoid in as many ways as possible. Even delaying treatment is successful for insurance companies, as by the time all the paperwork is sorted and an insurance company finally agrees to pay for treatment, it can be too late.

        What insurance companies love is not paying out money - for treatment or a cure.