• kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    ‘Fire this idiot’

    Followed immediately by “arrest this criminal”.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Trump knows that when he orders the military to fire on American citizens, Hegseth will enthusiastically pull that trigger. He would launch a nuclear weapon if Trump wanted him to. That kind of unquestioning psychopathic loyalty is incredibly valuable.

    Hegseth isn’t going anywhere, he’s one of Trump’s core players, like Bondi or PeeWee Himmler.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Even if that weren’t true, the idea that this type of open corruption is grounds for firing in a Trump admin is laughable. Trump himself is far more corrupt, and hegseth bring corrupt just goes further to ensure his loyalty. He can always have Bondi do a selective prosecution of this should he step out of line.

      It’s basically kompromat that only Trump (through control of the DOJ through Bondi) can use.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Under fire”? Man that sounds serious. What are they actually firing at him, though? Like how is he suffering or being penalized by being “under fire”?

    • slemptastrophe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s like when a corporation gets “SLAMMED” for some anti-social act, or policy. It means theyvare being criticized for it, but the accountability ends there.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It doesn’t mean anything. These headlines might as well read, “quell your rage, educated masses: the bad people are finally getting the negative attention they deserve, so put down your pitchforks…”

      It’s a slow drip of hope that consequences are just around the corner. It keeps uprisings at bay. Until decades later people realize, “wait a minute… how’s this guy running for President? Wasn’t he ‘under fire’ for some shit not long ago?”

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah the editor toned down the quote in the headline. The actual quote from the article was:

      “Firing this drunk idiot is the bare minimum. @PeteHegseth should be prosecuted.”

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah it’s probably not going to happen until after the Republicans are out of office and someone can fix the DOJ.

      • 13igTyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Republicans being held responsible and suffering consequences after leaving office? That’s a funny joke, but I’ve already heard it.

      • e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        even if at some point the rule of law returns and they will prosecute, this unhinged piece of shit would rather murder-suicide his whole family than assume any responsibility and consequences

    • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That requires more energy than shooting him out of the solar system.
      I’m all for energy efficiency!
      Nice side effect: he has more time to contemplate the reason behind his long journey.

      • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Alternatively, launch toward the sun, include a solar power tracker, and track and follow the trajectory for science/physics class work!

        Based on trumps position today, calculate where his bloated corpse will be in 9 hours, the length of a workday, which is something he never personally experienced, but tried to make worse for the average person.

        Double whammy of learning about history and science!

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m always so angry when this gets brought up. He loved that fucking peanut farm and he gave it up! That’s how much he cared about the American people. We didn’t deserve him.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Someone more knowledgeable clarify this to me ?

    “Pete Hegseth tried to make a LOSING insider trade on his advance knowledge of Trump’s Iran war plans, which he advised to start,” Grant Stern, managing editor of Occupy Democrats, posted on X. “This is the height of criminality and incompetence.”

    How was the trade losing ? whatever stock it was went down ? was it something akin to weapons manufacturing ? and if I understand correctly, it was expected to go up because of their involvement in the “war effort” ?

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There are ways to make money when stocks go up, of course, but there are also ways to make money when stocks go down. We don’t know the details, but the bottom line is that he bet one way, and the market went the other.

    • Shirasho@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You can gamble on whether a stock price will rise or fall. When going to war, stock prices for war companies rise because they are expected to get a lot of business, but if that call to war is suddenly canceled, then the stock price for that company decreases.

      If he made a losing bet, one of two things happened:

      1. The value of the stock was going to drop way below the value it started at, so he would earn a large payout on that gamble.

      2. He was funneling large amounts of money to other insider traders.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Thank you. I didn’t know that was possible. How do you do such a gamble, practically ? Is it something that banks offer, or something you can do from a smartphone app ?

        Additionally, how does #2 work ?

    • Ænima@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Don’t have to be a good criminal to do crime! Dude’s an amateur at insider-trading!

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Martha Stewart did this shit. You might argue she is more competent than Hegseth. And she went to prison.

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The tweet is linked, but doesn’t give any details. So we don’t know - and it might well not be true. What can be asserted without proof, can be rejected without proof.