• Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are you actually reading my messages or just getting a vibe and running with it or what? That picture wasn’t meant to be scientific evidence it was simply to demonstrate the falseness of your point about the actual scientific paper not being linked in the article.

    I can tell you are defensive about being treated as stupid which isnt what time trying to do. Actually read what my comments say please.

      • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Go to the guardian article from the OP. Find the link that was in the image I posted. Its pretty close to the top.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          No skin in the argument, I just came to the comments trying to find the study because that link is broken for me. If it’s working for you, would you mind linking it here? I can’t find the specific one being referenced thru the miasma of google being absolute garbage and it being a recent enough publication that the academic DBs I have access to seemingly don’t have that issue yet.

          (splash screen at the broken link)