The brain renewal concept could have applications such as treating stroke victims
If this can restore functions to stroke victims again, it’s absolutely amazing.
If this is vastly successful which remains to be seen, there might be a path format to the longevity part of the idea.
Such a sweet looking girl, but her brain is mush. 😐
I have no idea what your point is here, Democrats have supported this for a long time, but have been blocked by republicans in Congress.
You complain about $7.25, now you complain doubling it isn’t enough. And you throw around speculations as if they are points for your position.
$15 may not be a lot, but it’s obviously A LOT better than $7.25.
That’s a bullshit argument, when Harris clearly supports raising the minimum wage.
I agree it’s long overdue, like decades overdue. But Harris has clearly stated she wants it increased.
Harris at Aug. 10 Nevada campaign event:
When I am president, we will continue our fight for working families of America, including to raise the minimum wage and eliminate taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers,
I’m not personally a fan of the tip thing, that’s a stupid idea IMO, but the minimum wage, absolutely needs to be way higher.
At her campaign 2020 Harris supported increasing minimum wage to $15,-.
Yes the guy in the photo looks like a priest, and FSB has taken control of the Russian Orthodox church.
That’s just one way Russia is influencing previous Soviet states. Hopefully Russia will fail, if not now, then when they lose the war against Ukraine.
Her plan to help families with a fixed amount to buy a house for example, is more help to people with less money than rich people.
From your previous comments it seems like even AOC wouldn’t be left wing enough for you? Because even AOC is fundamentally in favor of a regulated free market capitalism as the economic basis for society, much like social democrats in Scandinavia.
The way to end fracking for good, is to provide enough sustainable energy, Kamala Harris has explicitly stated that she will work towards that.
I agree more effort on environment would be beter, but this is probably the best we can realistically get right now.
And between the 2 options, there is zero doubt that Kamala Harris is working towards the right goals, and Trump is not.
I thought they didn’t want to be part of Russia. But WTF is the difference the way they behave?
People really shouldn’t care about the color. Her heart seems to be in the right place, her policies are good, and she is definitely very competent.
On the other hand we have Trump, who is a flaming narcissist, and mostly want to escape jail and lower taxes for the rich, and is a moron.
How is this even a race?
PS: Interesting article, with some good observations IMO.
The amount of people in the world is a pretty insane number, which makes “almost nobody” 8800 users visiting per day just on lemmy.world, and it’s still growing pretty fast.
I’m fine with reddit doing their shit for the masses, and the ones with a bit more critical sense coming here.
OP included link to the full pdf, and is way nicer format to read.
Probably not, they have a nice cozy arrangement where they share the power. To allow multiple parties would mean to give that up, and most likely neither side is really interested in that.
When only 2 parties take turns ruling the country, the checks and balances don’t really work well when stressed. Because the party that needs to be checked, control half the apparatus, and can disrupt large parts of the other half.
Countries with maybe 10+ parties in parlament like many European countries have, will never have a single party with control of half the apparatus responsible for the checks and balances.
This is a huge reason first past the post is bad for democracy, apart from also not representing the population as fairly as is possible with numerous parties of influence.
This problem permeates throughout the entirety of the system, including the judicial, where judges belong to one or the other party, enabling an imbalance with total control for one party in for instance the supreme court.
With a multi party system, a single party would NOT be able to take control in the way we have seen happen in USA, which obviously shouldn’t be possible, and also doesn’t help to prevent corruption.
deleted by creator
Exactly. Lower taxes on the rich an cooperations, and it will only get worse.
This is a surprising but welcome development IMO. I always found the case against him fishy.
Unfortunately this comes many years to late, Julian Assange is a broken man today, and USA succeeded in their scare tactics on breaking US law, despite it’s not illegal in the country you are in.
I don’t understand how it was even considered delivering him to USA from UK, UK is AFAIK known for not delivering people to prosecution for actions that aren’t illegal in UK.
That said I don’t agree with what he did, and I think he was used as a Russian asset.
For major markets that’s actually rare, and usually not even because they under invested, they just didn’t quite get it.
Their actually successful strategy is to make an inferior product, sell it slightly cheaper, undermine the competition, then achieve near monopoly.
But your comment is of course funnier. 😋
This serves as a great reminder that Tim Walz is……
I think you mean human being. If it’s a mistake it’s not an attempt to deceit like is kind of implied by reminding us he is a politician.
Contemporaneous news reports in Nebraska indicated that Mr. Walz was still in his home state during the spring and did not leave for China until August.
That doesn’t sound like certainty to me. So how strong are those indications?
Maybe Walz remembers it wrong, the incident would still be very recent, and the warning sincere about not going to mainland.
But it could also be he remembers correctly, and the “indications” are wrong.
No matter which, it doesn’t really matter if it was 2 months later or not. It was definitely at around that time.
No I didn’t, that’s very interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_political_parties
What I don’t get is, how Hitler managed to take control with that many parties? He should not have been in a position with power to do that?