Daniel Tocci’s attorney had previously argued that the case should be dismissed because “all the evidence" stemmed from his Capitol siege case.
Daniel Tocci’s attorney had previously argued that the case should be dismissed because “all the evidence" stemmed from his Capitol siege case.
Why? It’s not double jeopardy. It’s a new charge based on legally collected evidence.
They think that because they were pardoned the investigation was illegal.
Does he have children? Cause if so a call to CPS is in order
That’s what the second part dismisses with explanation, I believe the why was simply rhetorical to respond to the thought.