Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a US representative, said on Wednesday that she will oppose any future US military aid to Israel, including for defensive systems.

In a statement on social media, Ocasio-Cortez said that Israel was fully capable of funding “Iron Dome and other defensive systems”, and that “consistent with my voting record to date, I will not support Congress sending more taxpayer dollars and military aid to a government that consistently ignores international law and US law”.

Her remarks on Wednesday follow reports that she pledged to oppose any future military aid to Israel during a New York City Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) forum on Tuesday evening.

“Our allies who need our military aid must understand that we will provide it consistent with the Leahy amendment and the foreign assistance act”, Ocasio-Cortez added, referring to a law which prohibits the US from providing military support to army units that violate human rights.

According to City & State, which obtained a partial recording of the DSA forum, Ocasio-Cortez told members: “I have not once ever voted to authorize funding to Israel, and I will never,” adding that “the Israeli government should be able to finance their own weapons if they seek to arm themselves.”

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    nope they were flamed for not doing more. we had limits on weapons and getting aid to isreal was a fight even though it got through. there was aid to plestine. we friggen made a dock to get around israel blockading areas. peoples memories are either miniscule or they edit them as it goes by.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This is historical revisionism.

      we had limits on weapons

      Literally one paused shipment. Big fucking deal.

      getting aid to isreal was a fight even though it got through

      The overwhelming majority regularly voting yes is not my idea of a fight.

      there was aid to plestine.

      There was aid during Trump’s term too. In both cases it was Israel dictating how much aid got through.

      we friggen made a dock to get around israel blockading areas

      A useless dock that was criticized for being useless the moment it was announcement and eventually was used by the IDF.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        its not revisionist. the limits where on types and size of weapons. your reply shows it exactly. it was not good enough so lets just choose worse. before trump we were trying but now its just israel calling the shots. we friggin attacked iran. jeez just a bit after he took office the plans for the west bank as a vacation destination were thrown up. I just don’t get folks that can’t tell the difference between better and worse.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          the limits where on types and size of weapons.

          There were no limits other than a pause on one shipment of 2000 pound bombs. That is almost literally nothing.

          before trump we were trying

          Your thoughts and prayers don’t matter to the Palestinians Israel was starving to death.

          Israel was always calling the shots with regards to Palestine; Trump is just more blatant about it. He’s also worse on Iran, but that’s a completely different conversation.

          it was not good enough so lets just choose worse

          That doesn’t have fucking anything with what we’re talking about. You made a claim about Democrats; you don’t get to deflect by talking about Republicans.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            its completely what we are talking about. perfect being the enemy of good. The use of pause is pretty disengenous. yes it was paused until 2025 when trump took office which is what stopped the pause. your whole middle section again shows you can’t tell the difference between better and worse. I would never want you “working” to help me. this reminds me so much of obama care. that half a loaf has made things a bit better for me than the no loaf some people seem to prefer. don’t get me wrong I want the whole loaf but refusing to let anyone get the half to make a moral stand is not helping them.