• Tigbitties@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    He either fucked up somewhere, he refused to do something “they” wanted or he wanted to do something “they” didn’t want.

    With the potential of what AI can and/or shouldn’t do, I think it might be one of the last two. That’s only because money is involved and it feels like greed is rampant.

    Then again, maybe he’s a pedo.

    I’m not sure if this makes me a pessimist or a conspiracy nut.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What a waste of your time to write this drivel and a waste of everyone else’s that read it. You literally just wrote a bunch of fucking nonsense, may as well claim he’s also the goddamn devil incarnate, since you’re just handing out random claims.

      AI firm’s board said Altman was ‘not consistently candid in his communications with the board’ and had lost its confidence

      He lied, but yeah it’s because he refused to do something “””they””” told him to do. Sure, definitely makes sense to make the claim you did with 0 evidence, suggestive or not that goes against the only actual information anyone that isn’t the board has.

      Do you usually go around answering people’s questions about shit you don’t understand? You have no insight or even a meaningful quote, but no instead it’s “maybe he’s a pedo”. Who are you, some sort of phony stark wannabe?

      To answer your question, yes it absolutely makes you sound like a fucking nut.

      What’s really wild to me is how you put forth this bullshit yet make no mention of this bullshit.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You also skipped the part where they said it’s about money, when this is the same board as the original nonprofit, and they are not investors.