Monica Lewinsky penned on op-ed Monday calling for a series of constitutional amendments, including age limits for elected officials and a ban on presidential self-pardons. In a piece in Vanity Fai…
  • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
    51·
    1 year ago

    …

    Dems only need to be slightly better than the Republican to get votes.

    If you raise the bar for Republicans, it raises the bar for Dems.

    It might even have to come to the point where they’d need to disagree on how much taxes the wealthy and billion dollar corporations have to pay.

    So the worse the Republicans are, the happier the dem party can keep their donors. Which means more donations to Democrats.

    I can’t think of a simpler way to explain that, maybe someone else can help if it still doesn’t make sense

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
        41·
        1 year ago

        It’s not. Which is why Republicans still manage to become president…

        But you’re thinking about what would be best for the country. Unfortunately a lot of democratic politicians are more concerned about the amount of political donations they will receive.

        And the wealthy have a lot of money to give, but don’t give it to people willing to substantially raise their taxes

        That’s the rub. The people running the political parties care more about getting elected than helping America once elected.

        So they’re going to keep picking their donors over the American public, and the worse Republicans are about it, the worse Dems can be while still (legitimately) being the lesser evil.

        That’s why they hate progressives so much. They’re raising the bar and presenting an option that’s better than:

        Well, it’s us or a Republican, so you have to vote for us.