• LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    11 months ago

    You’re correct, of course, but I think if a company uses the term “purchase” or “buy” up front and center, that it should be considered one.

    FWIW, before posting this, I looked around on the Google Play Store and they are suspiciously hesitant to actually use those words. Their top charts are “paid,” going to a “Paid” app just shows the price, etc. But despite showing a link to their terms of service, they never state that it is a lease.

    • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Edit: Sorry, meant to reply to the comment above you!

      They’re not really leases either. Leases last for a defined period of time, like “one year,” or they renew at regular intervals, like “monthly.” “Pay up front and we’ll let you keep this license for either forever or until we decide to revoke it without notifying you” isn’t the same thing.

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Apple uses the word “Get” for free things and simply displays the price on the button of paid apps. No mention of the nature of the transaction. That’s in the Germa of agreement you “read” and agreed to.

    • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same thing that Sony did with movies on the PS. “You’re buying a revocable licence”

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      All they will do is call it purshaces or some other made up bs