Research says involuntary celibate men make “fundamental errors” about what women want in a partner.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        how tf did you make that mental leap?

        did you read the link or just jump into the comments with a rageon? because the link explains how the right wing thinks of this shit. I didn’t make it up, they did.

        • The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          My bad, I assumed we were actually staying on topic - getting incels mental help. I’ll correct myself and assume from now on that any comments that fail to make sense are bad-faith attempts to co-opt a post.

    • Evia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why would I mean apologism? They need their worldview reprogramming because their current worldview is misogynistic and false. Reprogramming would include comprehensive challenging of negative attitudes and modelling of correct, non-misogynistic beliefs. It should be done by people with psychological training because they have the skills and knowhow needed to reprogramme someone’s thinking but it doesn’t particularly need mental health professionals or collusive, misplaced sympathy.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I provided a link to the line of thought. If that’s not you, great. But that doesn’t mean it’s not real.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          yeah I got that. that’s why I responded:

          that depends on what you mean by addressing

          because there’s a wide array of responses and I’m genuinely curious to learn what you mean. Not because I was attacking your premise, but because there’s past history of this tact - that the world should accommodate a percentage of the population who have shown misogynistic tendencies. To which I say: nah. nope. naw.