• GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sensationalized clickbait.

    100 microwatts, aiming for 1W in 2025. That’s a big difference and 1W is still not enough for a cell phone. Phone-scale batteries aren’t even on the roadmap.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      1 Watt is plenty to power a phone on average. While idle a phone uses less than 1 Watt. The thing is, nuclear batteries are a misnomer, they’re actual electrical generators. For this to work in a phone, you’d want to pair it with an actual battery, and the generator would charge the battery while the phone is idle and that would provide enough power on average for when you’re actively using your phone.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      1W is enough for a cell phone, if you combined it with a capacitor for brief bursts at higher watts.

        • nous@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Not all phones need to play games and gaming phones don’t need to use this type of technology. I would love a phone that I don’t need to charge and most people could benefit from one. And for the select few that like to play intensive games on it then they can get ones that would need to be charged.

          Though I doubt this technology will be the answer to that want though.

        • ferret@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You throttle the cpu with long heavy workloads, just like phones already do due to the significant thermal constraints of the form factor.