Artificial intelligence is spurring a new type of identity theft — with ordinary people finding their faces and words twisted to push often offensive products and ideas

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      To a certain extent that’s just impossible since the degrees you’d have to go to for enforcement would inevitably lead to someone genuinely talking about a product they prefer getting penalized. Think of the episode of south park where the one girl turns out to be a living advert.

      There has to be serious limitation on bandwidth usage. First to ban targeted advertisement, second to make national, state level, and local adverts all get equal air time, and third to cut the amount of broadcast time that can be used for advertisement and page space that can have advertisements.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s a notable difference and good lawyers should be able to write the law around it.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The lawyers aren’t who I’m concerned about, it’s the social media corps who’ll just take to banning anyone who talks about any brand ever.

          You’ve basically silenced brand criticism because it can be seen as a backhanded advert for the competition.

          All the shittalk about the battlefront classic collection would get people banned for advertising BG3 by speaking negatively about its competition on the games market.

          Sounds stupid, is stupid, would happen anyways, especially if the corpos caught onto it and started paying for ban waves in their favor.