• Cam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wont Feddec support mobile extensions in the future?

  • Cam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now Brave needs to do the same and also create its own extension store

  • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using the nightly build, using the desktop extensions for a while now. It’s SO worth it. In particular, the YouTube “SponsorBlock” is super convenient.

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have other tweaks and scripts that I have written for personal usage. Using nightly Firefox makes it so I can use those tweaks universally on desktop and phone.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I get it, sponsors are what enable the content you watch to even exist. It’s one thing if it’s youtube ads, but those sponsors are directly partnered with and paying content creators. On the other hand, Patreon is really the best way to go for content you truly care about.

      • MrNobody@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I find this take amusing. Blocking the ads means the content creator doesn’t get paid for those ads since they won’t get seen by those end users, but sponsor’s have already paid the creator for that part. Whether you watch it or not the money has already changed hands, all it does is automate you skipping those segments.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I agree in the short term, video analytics still come into play for future sponsorships and payouts. Do you think a sponsor will be willing to continue paying a creator if their sponsor segments receive no watch time?

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m 100% not going to buy anything from those sponsored segments.

        Also, there is a white list option for your favorite creators

      • rdeets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting bootlicker take amidst a content creator strike in Hollywood. Granted YouTube isn’t under those Unions, but the power dynamics are quite similar (#YouTubeUnion)

        Sponsors don’t give a shit about creators, they are just an annoying necessity for the content creator.

        Why give a shit about a sponsor who doesn’t give a shit about the YouTuber you enjoy?

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do they actually lose anything from these sponsorships if you just skip that part? Because that’s basically what the addon does. I’m not sure these sponsorships go as far as looking at minutes watched or whatever, I assumed it’s a pre-agreed amount.

        • beanz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          must be, because half of them have the sponsor segment as its own chapter in the video, making it super easy to skip. I don’t imagine they would make it as easy if they really wanted you to watch it.

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sure parent is totally fine being subsidized by all the people not running it.

  • noodle@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s long overdue. I’ve been running Nightly to get around the shockingly limited number of addons available on Firefox for Android. Hopefully Mozzila don’t fumble the bag with this as its a great opportunity to steal users from Chrome.

    • raptir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I do find it funny when people talk about how few extensions are supported, when it has the best extension support of any mobile browser.

      Like I get it, but still.

      • noodle@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Relative to desktop, it is comparatively few.

        Best on mobile, yes. The few they allow in FFfA stable is a tiny amount considering how many actually can work, but Mozilla arbitrarily decided they won’t allow.

      • NickNak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It used to be able to support all desktop addons but they for some reason took that away a while back

          • NickNak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t know it was a mass rewrite, I just assumed they ruined the UI and features to “keep” up with mobile chrome, as most of these big tech companies do

  • jamms@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox on Android used to do this. I switched to Kiwi when they dropped it.

  • Leminator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds huge! This may be a dumb question, but: do extensions on mobile require any special security tools that don’t already exist?

  • vinyl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been using Iceraven, although it only supports a handful of extensions such as dark reader and uBlock