Was just watching Jack Ryan Season 3 and seeing the display of force and their movements causes some interesting dissonance given what we know now.

  • oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rewatching Stargate and international cooperation feels so strange and bereft somehow. A kinder path.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is such a popular misconception I really don’t understand. Russia was so entirely dependant on the US for their logistics in WW2 it’s shocking how little it’s talked about. They were supplied American food and trucks in mass. Without the help of American supplies Hitler would of beaten Russia. Then once the Western front was more of a threat the Russians were able to surge forward with their mass of bodies and utter disregard for casualties.

      The Russian army has always been a joke. Brutality and lack of regard for human life is their strength. Theyre like the big dumb fat kid who bullies people in school. You get in a real fight with em and it quickly becomes obvious they haven’t ever done cardio (logistics, supplies) and there’s very little muscle mass (technology) hiding behind the fat layer (overblown specs and lies about capabilities).

    • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The USSR that was massively propped up and kept in the fight thanks to the absurd volume of war materiel being pumped in by Britain and America?

      A general disregard for numbers of casualties, an almost complete lack of maintenance capability for heavy vehicles, and unimaginative tactics relying primarily on overwhelming numbers and firepower might have ground down the resource starved Nazis, but it would have been a very different story against the Allies.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Russians didn’t defeat the Nazis, they stopped their advance. While this was critical for the eventual defeat of the Nazis, it is not the same thing. The Nazis were defending against advances from Allied forces along 3 flanks, while stopped-dead against the 4th in Russia. The Russians also lost 1.5 million people in the battle for Lennongrad and were almost out of supplies. The wouldn’t budge because it was their absolute last stand. By the end of that battle Russian soldiers were reporting to the lines without weapons or boots, and picking up both from the guy in front of them when he was killed. It was a horrific nightmare of a situation. It was a critical victory against the Nazis, but not their ultimate defeat. The Nazis were defeated when the western forces advanced on Berlin and Hitler killed himself rather than be captured.

      • TaTTe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would like to make one correction. Berlin didn’t fall because the Western forces captured it, but it was in fact the Red Army that got there first. This of course doesn’t change the fact that the Soviets never would have managed it by themselves, but this is the reason why claiming “the Soviets defeated the Nazis” is technically true.

        • fidodo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Getting there first means you get credit for winning the whole war?

          • TaTTe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They were on the winning side, so they did win the whole war. But as I said, they didn’t do it alone nor would they ever have been able to win without all the help they received from everyone else fighting the Nazis at the same time. I don’t think current events should be a reason to see history differently. The Soviets were a powerful war machine during WWII and their contribution played a huge role in the outcome of that war.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the correction. It’s crazy how many countries were required to defeat the Germans in WWII.

    • NotAFuckingBot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was in the Air Force in the late 70s. Worked in the flight surgeon’s office, so if anything went down on the flight line, we were there.

      If you wanna see Kegels In Action, watch what happens when many many gallons of JP-4 gets spilled on nukes inside a B-52D on the alert pad.

      Fun times!

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      By far the funniest part of that movie was fucking Nicaragua’s involvement, not the Soviets’. Shit worked, too - I knew many conservatives back in the '80s who genuinely thought Nicaragua was a threat to invade us.

  • Blue and Orange@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Modern Warfare 2/3 where Russia not only manages to successfully invade the US, but brings it to it’s knees.

    Even if you set aside the fact that the US has the world’s most powerful military and a heavily armed civilian population, geographically it would be virtually impossible to invade from another continent.

    But fiction is fiction. And the Modern warfare trilogy was outstanding.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the Swiss population might be more heavily armed in the sense of “percent of people with a military-grade weapon”

      “Number of military-grade weapons per person” is almost certainly the US, but guns being primarily fetish items / personality markers in the US means the distribution is very top heavy.

  • freamon@endlesstalk.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s also surreal (for a different reason), to hear lines like

    Why attack Russia? Aren’t they our friends now?

    from Terminator 2.

  • Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recently saw the Rambo movies for the first time, and yeah I laughed about how they portrayed the russians.

    Really goes to show that perception management is an effective strategy as long as thats all you do.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but isn’t that American propaganda?

      We needed a bbg to justify our actions. I’m not saying it was out of nowhere, but the scale of the thing certainly played well for certain politicians.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m old enough to remember when movies like ‘Firefox’ and ‘The Hunt For Red October’ first came out.

    The US was always miles ahead of the Soviets. It was so bad that during the Reagan Era the Right had to come up with a new metric that let the Reds look tougher than they were. “Throw weight” was the measure of how big a load an ICBM could carry. Because the Russians had inferior tech, they had to build bigger missiles. Kind of how a 1700’s musket had a higher caliber than an M-16. It was actually a symbol of soviet inferiority, but you’ll hear people talking about it to this day.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the other hand, it does make the player character in certain Modern Warfare/Battlefield single player campaigns mowing down Russian mooks by the dozens seem a bit more realistic 😅

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    All of this was apparent since Afghanistan at the very least. Probably says a lot more about the US and NATO trying to justify maintaining itself after the USSR collapsed than it does about Russia.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Essentially the CIA and DHS are highly involved in the production, including script writing. Pretty much like everything Tom Clancy’s was ever involved with (including posthumously). Tom.Clancy used to give talks at the NSA, had his books reviewed by the intelligence agencies before publishing, etc.

        Pretty sad how quickly Lemmy turned into a shitlib space that pointing out that stuff literally done in collaboration with the intelligence and militaries agencies is fucking propaganda.

  • Sims@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think you have any clue what the military power of the Russians are. I bet you’ve watched your telly and just trust whatever you are told by western ‘analysts’. Currently, Russian military is the strongest military in the world, and are winning against the third Nato backed army. Deal with it. Watch ‘The Duran’ on YT, or follow some real news channels on Telegram…