If you click the triangles next to the categories, there are some subcategories grouped by place—like:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Television_series_set_in_5th-century_Anglo-Saxon_England

Here’s a good resource:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Television_series_by_century_of_setting

Yeah—“job creation” only makes sense in the timeframe of making incremental changes to industry to adjust to changes in the labor pool. On the timeframe of decisions that alter future demographics, “job creation” is a distorted and detrimental lens.

Only if you ignore the opportunity cost—i.e., the number of terrestrial jobs that could have been created with the same investment.

Nice try, FBI stylometric profiler.

Nah—the danger he represents is not as an individual but as an example. His fate needs to serve as a deterrent, and apparent random violence doesn’t have that effect.

deleted by creator

But would the energy recovered from using it as fuel be more than the energy required to ship it to China?

A trait being selected for doesn’t always mean it’s desirable to the individuals who have it.

With an average-sized spoon, every spoonful could be a different type of 6 bean soup—it’s like getting five thousand soups in one!

Ones I haven’t seen mentioned so far:

• Rashomon
• Dr. Strangelove
• Princess Mononoke
• Wallace & Gromit: The Wrong Trousers
• Ran

Private health insurance.

Seems like an opportunity for a bunch of street artists to show up at court and pull an “I’m Spartacus”.

If any element of the Marvel universe respected the laws of physics, it would break the rest of the franchise.

The only foreigner I’ve heard glorifying violence after Kirk’s killing is Elon Musk.

They’ll rename the Gulf of Mexico again.

Not to excuse him or anything—but I have to remind myself that high-profile targets of anti-semitism (or racism in general) are exposed to orders of magnitude more of it than private individuals, and are correspondingly more likely to interpret it as a cause of things that anyone else can see have other motivations.

if the death is actually only a means to an end and not the end itself

I would restrict the intended end to institutional change—it’s not an assassination if you kill someone for their parking space, but it is if you kill them for their school board vote.

Edit: I guess I’d also have to add killing someone purely for their notoriety.

Did they select Whatsapp as a main communication channel and direct their supporters to it?

Or did they just start a group chat to reach out to supporters who were already on the app?

Two likely possibilities:

• They’re tuning out the social aspects of the situation enough that the DMN can disengage, or
• They’re so habituated to the task that they no longer need to consciously think about it (what OP calls “muscle memory”).

Or in theory, they might have learned the skill in such a way that the DMN can do it without the FPN—like if they treat it as a form of storytelling.