Just your typical internet guy with questionable humor

  • 86 Posts
  • 1.05K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle






  • Huh, I’m slightly older than your dad. As for “how is a 36-year-old supposed to act?” - that depends a lot from person to person. I’m a fucking hermit who works with IT and hates corporate social media. A friend of mine from high school is still one that goes to bars and parties with his wife for both to drink, eat and listen to live music, both also often post to instagram.


  • Pictured: Nadella holding in his hands all the profit M$ can make in the next 30 years even if AI booms like he really really really wants it to.

    artificial intelligence (AI) risks becoming a speculative bubble unless its use spreads beyond big tech companies and wealthy economies.

    Oh, you mean there is a risk it becomes the thing it already is? Boy, imagine that!

    The really funny thing is how he says that “the benefits need to spread outside the tech sector”. Golly gee, I wonder why other sectors haven’t benefited yet! Could it be that it’s not worth the hype and it does not improve anything that typical computer systems are already working on, like managing electrical grids, keeping track of shipments, avionics, etc? Nah, it’s all the doomers’ fault




  • Two that come to mind are GURPS Supers and HERO[1], both roll 3D6 and allow you to make pretty much any type of character you want with incredible detail. Character creation is also the single biggest hurdle for both systems, since you just have so many options that even using their character creator programs makes you feel like you might be missing something.


    1. 1d6chan has some of the best overviews of some systems, as curated by /tg/ anons. Case in point: “The dark history of Hero System is that the game is written by an actual lawyer. Much like how a Lawyer Mind set killed off AD&D, and TSR, the same has slowed and largely killed off adoption of the system, leaving it a forgotten relic. Said author has gone out of their way to curb fan sites, roll20 support, and much more. After all lawyers are trained to stomp out fun in the name of Copyright.” ↩︎



  • The bottleneck isn’t acquiring plastic. The bottleneck is everything else.

    This is spot on. I’ve had resin printers for ~6 years now, I’m quite skilled at adding supports to models (and despise pre-supported ones). I bought the first one fully intending to print RPG minis and maybe also make my own 40k army. Printed a lot of minis, printed some on commission, sold some, including 40k, but never made an army, “my” army, I get stuck at choosing a force/faction and then making the composition. The ready made combat patrols just feel “meh”

    Most importantly, I only know one 40k group and they play ~30km away from where I live. I already do that kind of trip every single day for work, so that was a huge dampener to me.




  • From my stupid understanding of Korean customs and law, the judgement must’ve been like this:

    Lawyer: “Your honor, my client, the tobacco companies, generate a revenue of 10 billion won and spend 5 on advertising. The NHIS can only ever spend 1 billion against us.” Judge: “Since you have more money, tobacco companies, you are more correct. NHIS, go get fucked for not being rich enough.”

    The lower court said the NHIS’s payments to medical institutions were the fulfillment of its legal obligations under the National Health Insurance Act and the execution of funds collected or supported under that law — meaning the benefit payments were a duty, not a compensable loss.

    It also held that the smokers themselves did not have valid claims for damages against the tobacco companies, citing difficulty in finding defects in the cigarettes and a lack of proof of individual causation between smoking and lung cancer.

    But the court said epidemiological research has limits, noting that it does not, in fact, provide precise information about what caused a particular individual’s disease.

    To be fair, the argument is scientifically valid, there are many things that increase the risk of cancer, so it’s hard to pinpoint “the cause”. HOWEVER, a judge deciding that “you can’t really prove it was the smoking that caused the cancer” sounds like someone “paying” for the “free gifts” he received from his tobacco friends.