On [CloudFlare, user224.com(https://domains.cloudflare.com/?domain=User224) renews annually at least than $11

That’s where I got my domain (I was using them at the time, but it doesn’t matter), for that price, and that includes whois privacy.

Perceiving the effects isn’t the same as perceiving the object, unless you take an extraordinarily pedantic definition of “perceive”.

And considering an individual electron to be an object that you perceive is likewise not commonly an everyday occurrence, unless you take a likewise pedantic definition of “object”.

And even the word “perceive” was my choice of word, describing specifically that I believed that the OP meant to exclude things like subatomic particles. So even in the end you’re still trying to argue that I didn’t really mean what I meant, due to word choice, which is also a very pedantic thing to do

News 2: electric Boogaloo

You can perceive high speed electrons in various ways, in your every day life?

Ok, that level of pedantry is my job

Because there is a huge demographic of nerds that are actually chuds and learned absolutely nothing from being bullied and/or being a beginner when they were younger.

I bet you can picture the demographic that they overlap with, but I’ma try not to explicitly make this political.

Sorry I misread when you said “library” for some reason I thought you meant “external library”

The problem that I’m trying to solve and I think OP is also trying to solve, is that they want the files to be on their NAS because it is high capacity, redundant, and backed up, but many users have access to the NAS, so they cannot rely on immich alone to provide access permissions, they need access permissions on the files themselves.

I solved this by having a separate share for every user, and then mounting that user’s share on their library (storage label).
It sounds like OP wants a single share, so having correct file ownership is important to restrict file access to the correct users who are viewing the filesystem outside of immich.

Not sure what you mean by your last paragraph, how do you assign a share to individual files (assume you mean directories) outside of immich’s need for storage?

Library access won’t allow upload, this will.

My knowledge here isn’t super deep, but it seems like you can do mapping per-share-per-ip, which means you can say “all file access coming from the immich host to this share will act as this user” which I think is fine if that share belongs to that user, and you don’t have anything else coming from that host to that share which you want to act as a different user. Which are very big caveats.

You conveniently skipped over the “and are able to perceive” part

Yes, except for the NAS user ownership of those files.

I think there might be a way to do the file ownership too, which I’ll get to at the end, but I don’t think its necessary. for now here is my setup:

First off, you need to be using Storage Templates.
Second, you need to have either a fresh install, or users need to be set up with storage labels that aren’t their intended final storage labels.

In docker, you’ll need to set up an external NFS volume for every user. I use portainer to manage my docker stacks, and its pretty easy to set up. I’m not sure how to do it with raw docker, but I dont think its complicated.

in your docker compose files, include something like this

services:
  immich-server:
    # ...
    volumes:
      - ${UPLOAD_LOCATION}:/data
      - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro
     - type: volume
        source: user1-share
        target: /data/library/user1-storage-label
        volume:
          subpath: path/to/photos/in/user1/share
    - type: volume
        source: user2-share
        target: /data/library/user2-storage-label
        volume:
          subpath: path/to/photos/in/user2/share
    # and so on for every user
  # ...

volumes:
  model-cache:
  user1-share:
    external: true
  user2-share:
    external: true
  # and so on for every user

There are 2 things about this setup:

1. it does not scale automatically. this is fine as long as you don’t intend to be adding/removing users often.
2. it is only saving the photos and videos. all thumbnails and transcoded videos, etc, get saved to ${UPLOAD_LOCATION}. For me this is fine, I dont want to pollute my NAS with a bunch of transient data, but if you want that info then for every user, in addition to the target: /data/library/user1 target you’ll also need a target: /data/thumbs/user1, target: /data/encoded-video/user1, etc.

finally, redeploy, and add your users (making sure that the user’s storage labels match the target directories) or change your user storage labels (to match the target directories, and run the migration job). the storage label must not have existed before you deployed, otherwise it’ll get masked by the mount and you wont see the existing data.

You may also want to add similar volumes for external libraries (I gave every user an external “archive” library for their old photos) like this:

    - type: volume
        source: user1-share
        target: /archive/user1-storage-label
        volume:
          subpath: path/to/photo/archive

and once immich allows sharing external libraries (or turning external libraries into sharable albums) I’ll also include a volume for a shared archive.

To address the file ownership:\n I honestly don’t think its important, as long as your user has full access to the files, its fine. But if you insist then you have a separate share for every user and set up the NFS server for that share to squash all to that share’s user. Its a little less secure, but you’ll only be allowing requests from that single IP, and there will only be a request from a single user from that server anyways.
Synology unfortunately doesn’t support this, they only allow squashing to admin or guest (or disable squashing).

I think that “with some mass” wasn’t meant literally but figuratively, specifically to exclude things like shooting subatomic particles.

I think OP means the kinda of things humans interact with and are able to perceive in their every day life.

I feel like that’s even less like “everyday life” than OPs example of bullets lol

I had to read it a few times, I initially made the same mistake as you. It’s all there but I’m not used to carefully reading all the text on a silly post lol

God I loved demotivational posters

It’s illegal to hire people or refuse to hire people based on political beliefs or affiliation, so you’re not gonna have companies that only employ Trump supporters or employ no Trump supporters. Politics is considered a protected group wrt employment law in the USA and many countries.

But how would it actually work?
It’s not like it’s difficult to gauge employee sentiment about ICE. If your employees are strongly against it, then you simply don’t enter the competition for ICE contracts, or you choose to not renew the contracts when they expire.

I like your way, learning as an adult.

But if you were to hypothetically teach a child, then binary would be easier, and they eventually would memorize the positions.

Although realistically by the time they need their second hand, they probably don’t need to be counting on their fingers anymore. And I don’t think either of these systems is especially helpful for higher math, unless you’re multiplying or dividing by a power of 2. Maybe? I forget my 2s compliment operations now.

They only have to make an example of a few to discourage the rest.

The only real safety is with the instances hosted and run in locations difficult for American companies to pursue legal action

Yeah, but at the same time it’s kinda good for people to be able to see the kind of shit they’re posting for themselves.

It is propaganda, but it’s not good propaganda, and that’s what the community fact checking thing is meant to counter, imo.

Even if that was true, which it isn’t, a company should reflect the beliefs of its employees and community.

I haven’t watched it, but I’ve heard Mobile Suit Gundam 0080: War in the Pocket is a pretty brutal anti-war piece by the end.

If it’s an official govt agency I think it makes sense for them to be allowed on communications platforms and to be verified, so that people can see what they’re saying and know that it’s an official statement.

Then people can see the post and make their own judgements about it, knowing it’s an official agency statement.
Having twitter style factcheck for blatant misinformation is also important for this, though.