If you dig deep enough you’ll find some blatant racist shit in one of the conservative comms too, unless it got nuked by a mod. I don’t really care enough to go digging for it either.

Edit: oh here it is

(This is blatantly false, nothing in the law states this, it was doctored up by racists to drive immigrant hate)

Do a search and they’ve posted like 10 other articles to the conservative comm as well.

And also prempting Mr Monk as I know what he’ll say: “I only post the articles!!!1!11!”. Sure buddy. Sure.

Never, but it’s nice to actually have him say it out loud.

So that’s why he wouldn’t answer it during the debate

That’s what I always do. There are smaller creators that I support via donations or patreon but I never pay directly for the content itself.

you can’t tell me what to do!

It’s their se domain I saw it on, but most of their older domains also display this

http://z-library.se/

Actually I think it was right n

He can do whatever he wants as long as a stolen House and Senate via election fraud rubberstamps anything he wants and the courts are stacked too. That’s it, curtains and exit stage left on US freedom.

If all other things stay the same and SA starts punishing OPEC with production bumps, then yes 50 to 60/bbl is possible in the current balanced market. But these geopolitical risks are unpredictable and military action removing more production than SA could offset with it’s spare capacity would quickly drive it back to 100/bbl.

SA wants OPEC members to believe the 50/bbl threat because OPEC/OPEC+ as a whole have done nothing but overproduce and ignore quotas for years and years, bolstering their own profits while SA tries to take up the slack by cutting. SA is sick and tired of being taken advantage of by their “friends” in the cartel (truely a Leopards Eating Faces moment). Opec members will be more likely to comply with quota demands if there is an imminent market crash.

The US would want members to believe the 100/bbl war premium threat as that will keep reserves high and production on the market, as sellers will want to take immediate advantage of a spot market price spike, which in itself dulls the ultimate effect of said spike and prevents physical shortages that would be severely damaging to the US/OECD countries.

Frankly the entire thing is a giant “¯\_(ツ)_/¯” so make sure your gas tank stays full and we’ll wait and see.

control housing costs *maximize profit for corporate real estate investors

Fixed the whitewashed title.

TAX THE CHURCHES

I bet it can. These drones are a new war-of-volumes.
Even if you only have a 1 in 10, hell even a 1 in 20 connection rate of launched drone to hitting designated target. If each drone costs $300 to build and arm using commodity parts, but one hit can take out a high value T90M worth $4.5mil, that battlefield ROI is insanely high.

I know right? They don’t come cheap from the Rainbow Factory, those ponies drive a hard bargain.

Intentionally trying to subvert the Governor to make them look bad. A republican classic, undermine it from the inside then claim it doesn’t work and needs to be gotten rid of!

https://youtu.be/ilIubT7ands

Not with that attitude you can’t!

Yeah it’s legit, it’s been up a hot minute (since May iirc). I clicked the wrong zlibrary bookmark out of reflex and then remembered how hilarious the scare screen was.

More hilarious jokes have never been told in history

Let’s see the lifestyles of the CEOs for Springer, Wiley, and Elsevier for comparison.

FBI be like:

I… don’t condone such behavior but I also don’t hate this idea lol