I think I misread a statement about existing users not having their settings changed possibly on an update?
For individuals using JetBrains IDEs with commercial licenses, free trials, free community licenses, or EAP builds who do not explicitly consent to the new data collection model – nothing changes.
Only if Google makes such sweeping changes to make forward-porting the feature impossible.
Am I missing something? Non-paid versions also have to opt-in, no?
Delusional apple fanboy.
I don’t need a my phone to be a ‘flagship’. I am not an influencer. I also wonder what loads are you running on a phone that you meet performance issues.
You can get an android with microSD and 3.5mm jack for 250€.
You can still run all the software you want. Adblockers, torrent clients, emulators, even… browsers! There will still be new android phones that won’t suffer those limitations. They will also be cheaper than iphones.
Don’t get me wrong android is in a bad trajectory, it’s true that’s Google has been enshitificating as much as it can get away with. It’s still light years ahead of iOS.
If anybody cares for privacy or control of their devices, saving Android, even in alternative versions/vendors, is a much more viable option than switching to iPhone.
Developer ID verification will be part of Google Play and won’t be present in GrapheneOS
Straight from the horse’s mouth. The rest of the post is a good reminder that GrapheneOS are morons.
But why would you lie about this?
Because one walled garden does not exist yet. Because it’s possible to get around the proposed walled garden. Because there are android manufacturers that ship phones that are not going to be affected by this.
But no lets just promote the whole iOS and Android are 100% the same (not Apple and Google, those are the same) and give up on fighting those changes.
Let me guess, we’re I Danish (or when this shit spreads to my country) I would have identify my accounts to the government and or corporations.
Do not treat this as just a tantrum. It’s the right’s playbook of moving the overton window to the right by taking extreme positions and invoking the golden mean fallacy. It certainly has worked on MSM.
But if you break the law after on 2026 you don’t get any excuse for not having time to adapt to the new circumstances.
DRM is not free, somebody is getting paid to provide that DRM and they certainly don’t go unpaid if it doesn’t work.
You can just escape the spaces with a \ .
Motherfucker thinks demolishing the building will destroy the UN.
They didn’t kill them all in 1945 you know.
You are going to protest that they 've learned from that. They just learned not to say the word Nazi just like they learned not to oppose Jews instead of opposing genocide.
Why would it be more difficult to maintain and update a complex system?
They don’t have to accept outsider contributions on their mainline nor employ less people to work on it.
You don’t get to redefine open source. It’s always been about giving the source code to whoever you give the software.
Making it publicly available is an acceptable alternative to fulfill that obligation.
This is not fascism, ending the fillibuster is not fascism.
The Democrats should have done so when they were in government to try and implement the things they were elected for.
America’s broken political system certainly had a role in it’s slide to fascism.
Well I had the displeasure of having to use a candybar style phone my mother was using cause it was ‘easier’ for her.
But in my case, I disagree with the base premise of this post. The biggest anxiety and distraction caused by my phone is via phone calls. Asynchronous communications like sms and email are much better for me.
Does that work on the Mars colony as well?
So you are saying videogames fixed them?
There are android phones outside Google’s garden that will remain outside it’s walls. Apple’s walled garden vs Google’s future wall garden is a false dilemma.