Please don’t use straw man arguments.
Nowhere in the article it says Epstein was the only one. So you are opposing something that is never said.
The source claimed that Epstein served as a wealth manager for Russian President Vladimir Putin, as well as former Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe
The account highlights the shifting explanations Mr. Trump has given about what he knew — and didn’t know — about Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. He has denied knowledge of Mr. Epstein abusing underage girls, but also said last year that the financier “stole” young women who worked at his Mar-a-Lago club. The White House has said Mr. Trump barred Mr. Epstein from the club “for being a creep.”
After Ms. Maxwell was arrested, Mr. Trump did not raise any concerns about her behavior. “I just wish her well, frankly,” Mr. Trump said of Ms. Maxwell in 2020. “I’ve met her numerous times over the years, especially since I lived in Palm Beach.”
I find these parts most interesting
You are perfectly making my point: when you write “people who,…” you in that case are actually adressing OP and using the typical “pick me” mechanism to dodge addressing OP directly. (Because he didn’t say what you laid in his mouth (but you didn’t because you are talking about people)) What i wish: By highering yourself let’s not lower others but convince with our arguments.
With “people who…” you are creating groups that most of the times aren’t as homogeneous as we think.
people who cry ‘misogyny’
Who are you talking about and how do you know how “they” react to that argument?
People who cry about
people who cry ‘misogyny’
usually don’t write arguments that people talking about misogyny don’t agree to. But what they do, is being a special snowflake “I am not a feminist because they…”. That is a way of downtalking the feminist movement.
“We cannot all succeed when half of us are held back.” -Malala Yousafzai
Propably using some degoogled Android