Than the Iranian regime is the worst.

They’re in life or dead situation, don’t have to worry about voters and can’t be checked by free media.

This sounds reasonable

Stores the user’s birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26- 051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.

This is a poor wording

That law doesn’t require to verify the age of the user, it doesn’t have to, because it’s a law for parents.

What you’re saying is exactly slippery slope. You’re taking earlier examples of completely different laws, with different purposes and mechanisms, and you make your argument based on how the implementation of those laws worked.

Occam’s razor explanation of DMCA 1201: The law makers wanted to foolproof the law and implemented security measures that weren’t needed.

Also THE only argument you have for the fact thisaw is going to be changed is the law that changed (even if only temporarily) IN A GOOD DIRECTION!

You really made me laugh.

Who is pushing for this?

I want to know that too.

I know meta lobbied for app store accountability act or smth, I don’t remember it’s name. They didn’t do that to spy on people, but because they wanted to shift the blame.

This is a law FOR PARENTS.

It’s not a law for children, it doesn’t target to protect children from up, but to give parents the tools to set the age of the kids themselves.

Do you have any proof that those systems were created for control? You sure have if you express your opinions with such confidence.

But they did what the laws (Californian, Colorado’s and basically every other, except for the New York’s and Texan) required them to do.

Only penalty in this law is for OS makers that didn’t include such rules in the OS, paying per affected child.

Slippery slope again

Lawmakers don’t care whether you’re 18 or 56

Bot account?

I’ll be surprised if the Orange Ape really does that

But American government isn’t resposible for acts of domestic and international crime it’s citizens commit.

This is prime case of false equivalence.

If your president is a criminal, that doesn’t make your country responsible for their crimes, especially if they were unknown at the time of the election.

Put NixOS below RHEL

What modern country has totally collapsed in an economic sense?

Is this ragebait?

LMAO

Do you guys understand what total economic collapse means?

No modern country has ever totally collapsed

They’re 100% planing boots on the ground invasion with that amount of money

I find this hard to believe. What is the reasoning for that?

Edit: I read the report. The reasoning seems believable, but the tiers seem to be too narrow. Also the title of the post is a clickbait.

Some may argue that it is imperialistic propaganda, because it doesn’t include concept of people’s democracy.

I don’t think total economic collapse is possible, but not having some kind of recession in 14 years wpuld be weird

Are you crazy? Over 600 days?

I don’t understand this tax. Is it one time 5% of wealth payment? 5% wealth tax? When is it payed?