You’re thinking of a different commentor I did not say that

I meant there is no particular reason to expect a gui configuration tool for a gui Window manager that isn’t expected to be dynamic to have a cli.

Generally the use case is always maximize this window or always put it on a particular workspace etc.

If it has any path to being addressable via bash you would check its dbus interface if any.

The same feature on say i3wm also isn’t a CLI nor is it any more dynamic.

Windows rules and wmctrl don’t have identical use cases although there could be overlap

you cannot use it via bash you configure it and it applies actions to windows as they are created you cannot use it at all where plasma isn’t your desktop and as of wayland you cannot use a different window maanager with KDE plasma as wayland doesn’t have the idea of window managers.

I don’t think you are ever again going to have an agnostic way to do this

ya should have written money

it was completely hidden under a pile of made-up conspiracy bullshit

This is basically bullshit. I mean for ANY given thing you can imagine existing there is 5 weirdos on facebook somewhere but the substance and prevailing bitch fest as expressed by 99% of people bitching was perfectly comprehensible normal shit that you are completely retconning.

Linux desktop would be a lot further if the gnome project had died around the time 3.0 rolled out.

Tvs can last 20 years you’ll be lucky to get 2 years of updates

Maybe they should just bill a household regardless and dispense with the extra nonsense then you would just have to pay and couldn’t go on about it

Literally everything that is paid for with tax dollars wodks like that. Did you think you got a refund in the mail if you don’t drive on a particular road.

Can you actually use the ports on your dedicated GPU in this case?

Windows rules on KDE?

The overwhelming majority of systems consist of one monitor. For the minority on two monitors the overwhelming majority have 2 low DPI monitors or 2 high DPI monitors.

For those with mixed DPI screens only recently has any system supported scaling xwayland apps appropriately on such setups meaning some apps look like garbage and they still do on gnome. xrandr --scale to scale per screen has worked since 2003 and per screen fractional scaling works on Cinanamon under X right now.

To revise

90% of everyone

Single screen: Wayland == X Multiple similar DPI Wayland == X

5%

Mixed DPI with a mix of Wayland on X apps on every desktop but KDE X > Wayland

5%

Mixed DPI with a mix of wayland and X apps on KDE Wayland > X Mixed DPI with only wayland apps Wayland > X

I wonder why something that is only better for 5% and worse for 5% and requires 100% to deal with bugs missing features and growing pains has negative feelings attached!

It’s not like anyone had legit critique which online weirdos reframe as irrational

hampered by unresponsive complainer

How outside of your fantasies did people bitching actually slow down devs introducing features that people should have known were needed in 2008?

Wayland is 18 years old. From 2015 on people whose entire computer use was a browser and a terminal on their single screen laptop with intel integrated GPU were telling everyone else they needed to change over because X was already practically dead and wayland was ready for prime time.

Meanwhile even on the latest and greatest everything wayland still has at that point many problems, many limitations, and is from the perspective of many users not better in any way whatsoever and in many ways worse. Continue this for 11 years. By the time everything is ready for prime time you’ve already primed people to reject and dislike you.

infrequently used large tv hooked through the receiver

This makes it seem like Linux has a problem with multiple monitors when you just aren’t supposed to connect your 80s AV hardware between TV and computer. You should absolutely expect that to either require an active convertor to your obsolete shit AND OR cutting out the intermediary. If you are going to use weird shit its on you to actually understand how it works.

Out of all the people on earth you might literally be singular person anywhere with this setup. Meanwhile everyone else is just plugging in shit and watching it work.

This is what fake smart people look like

let’s start with the Ideal Gas Law

You didn’t even explain the gas law let alone prove that temperature was the factor

Next, statistical analysis of Tom Brady’s passing metrics indicate he plays better with higher inflated balls, not lower.

People do unethical things because they think it will benefit them. You didn’t even prove it didn’t benefit him you just asserted it based on…

. Notable is that he had better numbers in the second half of the Colts game, after the refs “properly inflated the balls” than in the first half.

This… isn’t a meaningful sample. It’s impossible to draw any conclusion from it. The fact that you think you can indicates that you don’t understand statistics or analysis.

The wrong assumption is that you have to pick the best of all possible everything the first time. People agonize less about choosing a type of car to spend $30,000 on knowing that if you sell it used its instantly worth 5000 less.

Meanwhile you can switch everything about your computer in 2 hours for free.

The level of violence was fantastically high like worse than a war torn country all the time for everyone. Along with all the starvation and disease which nobody could do anything about because even washing hands or what a disease is is completely unknown.

Starving by age 5, getting your head bashed in by 20 or a really ugly disease death before 30. Also you spent all your time struggling to have enough to eat continually.

Note that the difference was much less than the difference between 50 -> 5 and it was not true across all brands