• CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 hours ago

    True story.

    One night a woman came to our Catholic hospital ER in Central Texas because she was sexually assaulted.

    The doctor prescribed Plan B because the victim didn’t want to carry her rapist’s baby.

    Our hospital refused to dispense it. Poor woman had to wait two days to get it from CVS.

    This is the reality

    • J92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Excuse my life, but what the fuck is a Catholic hospital?

      “Welcome good sirs to my church of the Bristol Stool Chart!”

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The Seventh Day Adventists also have a shit ton of hospitals, the largest among the Protestant denominations iirc. You’ve probably heard of the Kellogg families impact on things like popularizing circumcision…

        SDAs also have a substantial impact on the modern conspiracy theory landscape. The cult at Waco was an offshoot, Bill Cooper incorporated their propaganda in his weirdo narrative, if you live in the US you’ve probably got their book mailed about the “Sunday Law”….

      • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Organized medical care has a long history of being carried out by members of religious orders, with formal doctors and nurses being pretty recent in the grand scheme of things.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Lots of hospitals were started by churches.

        One of Texas’s biggest medical providers is the Methodist Health System, with 12 full-fledged hospitals and over 100 clinics that started as a hospital in Houston founded by the Methodist church. For most people, it’s just another hospital. The church doesn’t get any of the money or anything.

        Catholic hospitals, however, are a little more notorious for denying care based on religious principles - with abortion and birth control being the big one. They won’t do abortions, offer contraceptives, or perform vasectomies, for instance.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I’m not religious in the slightest, but in my experience, them Methodists seem pretty chill. Worked with one to make their website a while a back and their pastor was the most laid back, easy to work with dude, loved everyone, black, white, brown, straight, gay, trans, whatever. I miss that guy.

          • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Methodists are also okay with women being pastors/priests/preachers. They’re also pretty good at begging everyone for money.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The old pastor retired and just so happened to have been replaced by a woman! I don’t know her personally like I did him, but every time I drive by, her messages out on the front board are always full of the same positivity and tongue and cheek shit I actually look forward to reading.

              Unlike the other churches around that are like “you better pray or you’re going to hell” and other threatening garbage.

      • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Excuse my life, but what the fuck is a Catholic hospital?

        “Welcome good sirs to my church of the Bristol Stool Chart!”

        What’s a Catholic hospital? It is a scram!

    • hopesdead@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Sorry to ask, but if such a place didn’t want to dispense it, why would they have it? Am I not understanding something about pharmacies here?

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Sorry shitstain, other parts of the country actually allow women to have rights.

    Go fail at saving some kids from drowning and let the civilized people do their thing.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      alcohol and too much sun does that, also caucasian people dont do well under the sun or alcoholism, its the red flushing to the face.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    19 hours ago

    To wit: there’s a NY state law that makes it illegal for state officials to help shit-ass states like Texas follow through on legal threats like this within the context of the NY legal system. This is that law working as intended.

    Or more succinctly: lick my taint, Ken Paxton, you fucking imbecilic psychopath.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      it’s only a matter of time before the supreme court forces new york to comply; i hope that the doctor is prepared for this and finds another way to help with protecting themself.

      when slavery was a thing, the shitty laws from shitty states to reclaim escaped slaves took primacy over laws from abolitionist states that would have protected them due to the supreme court and it took a war to overcome it.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        i hope that the doctor is prepared for this and finds another way to help with protecting themself.

        The airport code is YYZ but driving up from Buffalo is cool too.

      • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The US Supreme Court can’t currently do what you say without a law change at the federal level.

        Also, the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery (mostly) was passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865 after the end of the US Civil War.

          • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I didn’t think about what matters to SCOTUS at all.

            The law still matters to people and that’s what’s important. Only after we, abandon the rule of law will there be a complete breakdown of society and a descent into chaos and anarchy.

            I know from all the doom posting I see on Lemmy that many don’t, but I still have hope.

            • andros_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              We’ve been literally dismantling the first amendment (Establishment clause particularly). And the fourteenth (the whole fucking thing by EO).

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You’d think a world-class corporate news organiztion like Associated Press would be able to shoehorn that into the title somehow. And yet.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s a lot of information the shoe horn into the title when it seems perfectly reasonable just put it in the article itself. That’s what articles are for after all, the context.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        What are you talking about???

        In journalism, headlines have always been used to try to entice people into reading the article. Not to give the entire story so that people won’t need to read the article.

      • Floodedwomb@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s literally the second paragraph of the article. You’d think a literate person with time to write inane comments would be able to read the article. And yet.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          15 hours ago

          We’re gonna do this again?

          Hey! THE HEADLINE and THE BODY OF THE ARTICLE are two different things. Can you grasp the concept?? Does your inanity know no bounds?! Have you, at long last, no sense of decency, sir?!

          • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Hey! THE HEADLINE and THE BODY OF THE ARTICLE are part of the same body of work. If you want all the context, read all of the work.

            If they put all the context in the title, the title would just be the article and would need its own summary.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Indeed. The Title of the book and the Entirety of the Book are part of the same work! If you want to comment on the title of the book you MUST read the entirety of the book!

              The trailer for the movie and the entire movie are part of the same body of work. If you want to comment on the trailer for the movie you must see the entire movie first.

              The appetizer and the dinner are part of the same body of work if you want to comment on the appetizer you must eat the entire dinner first.

              Etc, Etc.

              If they put all the context in the title, the title would just be the article and would need its own summary.

              The title HAS a context without anything else being done. That is the point. The title (while being part of the same body of work) is alone. And here’s the thing: most people don’t see the whole movie before taking something away from the trailer. (Super-seekrit PRO TIP: The people who create the trailers know this and use it to their advantage.)

              • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Comparing a movie that takes an hour+ to watch to an article that it would take you 5 minutes to read tops to get enough context to not make dumb comments. Yeah, totally comparable.

                People like you are why I have to send multiple work emails after I’ve already mentioned all the relevant details in the first message, all because I didn’t put the whole gods damned message in the subject line.

                Take a hooked on phonics course if reading is that hard for you.

                • Optional@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  FFS I’m not talking about the article for a reason. How (or why) you refuse to understand that is beyond me.

                  Yeah yeah hooked on phonics, ace repartee. Anyway.

  • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Poor boy has had a rough week, first his wife says she wants a divorce because of his adultery and now he finds out he’s impotent in a different state.

    Being a dog fearing christian is tough in this day and age, especially when you’re actually a shitbag.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “While I’m not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed,” Bruck wrote in a letter to Texas officials.

    I imagine Paxton blew a gasket over that. Lmao.

        • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Definitely part of it, never met a Texan man who didn’t rage and throw a shitfit over the most minor of inconveniences.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            same goes for right wingers that gloriflies places like texas, and florida, they are equally reprehensible people. they were people on yt that were talking shit about california constantly, and they live LV(long story why they moved there) but thier business entirely depends on CALIFORNIA, since youtubing is based around LA anyways. they are asian by the way, one of the was bitching how to EVADE edd laws, because they were misclassifying employees and contractors/ or full time employees.

          • bthest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            I used to do regular driving trips to Mexico from NC and I swear to god everything was always fine in every state I crossed. People were nice, no police problems, roads well maintained, no traffic and quick city bypasses.

            But when I cross into Texas suddenly everything would turn to shit. The people were shitty, the roads were shitty, the radio stations were shitty, the police were shitty, Houston was a massive cluster fuck of detours and pot holes, the heat, the smells, literally EVERYTHING was just a bit shittier there than anywhere else. It was always a blessing to get across the Rio Grande and back into a civilized country.

            • Triasha@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              You drove through one big city and it sucked. LA and Chicago would have sucked to drive through as well.

              New York is better now I hear since they implemented congestion pricing.

              Correct me if I’m wrong, Huston is the biggest city I have ever been to.

              • bthest@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Cities aren’t a problem if you can avoid driving into them. But Houston literally had no bypass because they were being worked on. You were detoured through a maze of city streets. So if a detour sign was missing or fallen over (and they often were) then you were lost. This was before GPS and smartphones were common.

                It was like that for years.

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Texas politicians are so shit they need to infect other states.

    Get your shit together Texas.

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Because then it is not regulated. Meaning you’ll have scammers selling fake abortion pills, which will do nothing. Or even worse, pills with something else that could get you addicted.

      People are assholes, especially in a capitalist system. Regulation is necessary here.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        pills with something else that could get you addicted.

        It’s hard to get addicted to an unknown substance you’ve taken unwillingly and don’t know what it is in order to get another hit.

        I’d be more considered about psychos selling literal poison.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Unexpected trips don’t tend to be fun. Scary trips don’t tend to lead to addiction.

            Also, drugs are a lot more expensive than abortion pills, so whomever is putting the drugs in them is losing a lot of money doing so.