• 0 Posts
  • 52 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 9th, 2023

help-circle


  • “Jaywalking” is mostly a US thing made up by car companies to victim-blame pedestrians when they were killed by cars so they could avoid regulation themselves. Where I am we were taught very early in school how to safely cross a road safely, and pedestrians waiting to cross or already crossing a road generally have right of way even when no signals exist. It’s only an issue in backwards countries where cars have more rights than people and cities are designed for them instead.

    I cross without a signal daily because otherwise I’d have to walk all the way around the block to get to a crossing going the opposite direction from where I’d want to go then find a way to circle all the way back at other crossings. That would make leaving the house more than a little inconvenient, especially since everything I’d need is in walking distance so I rarely drive. To my knowledge I have not been killed by a car a single time.

    Edit: Thanks for the downvote, doesn’t change the facts.

    The very word jaywalk is an interesting—and not historically neutral—one. Originally an insult against bumptious “jays” from the country who ineptly gamboled on city sidewalks, it was taken up by a coalition of pro-automobile interests in the 1920s, notes historian Peter D. Norton in his book Fighting Traffic. “Before the American city could be physically reconstructed to accommodate automobiles, its streets had to be socially reconstructed as places where cars belong,” he writes. “Until then, streets were regarded as public spaces, where practices that endangered or obstructed others (including pedestrians) were disreputable. Motorists’ claim to street space was therefore fragile, subject to restrictions that threatened to negate the advantages of car ownership.” And so, where newspapers like the New York Times once condemned the “slaughter of pedestrians” by cars and defended the right to midblock crossings—and where cities like Cincinnati weighed imposing speed “governors” for cars—after a few decades, the focus of attention had shifted from marauding motorists onto the reckless “jaywalker.”

    Tom Vanderbilt, Slate.com



  • I’m not sure how that’s relevant? If the default folder was “Camera” or “Pictures” or whatever else your malware would just scan those directories and any real attack likely already does. You’ve only described how having malware on your machine compromises your machine, not exactly a groundbreaking revelation.

    Windows hasn’t been my main os for a while but I’m fairly certain you can mount/unmount drives without rebooting. That’s certainly the case on Linux, and my distro definitely tells me what processes are locking drives when applicable.




  • On your end there’s not much to consider here. You can let them know they refunded the entire order, chances are they’ll just write it off. If they ask you to send it back it should be entirely at their expense, do not pay to send it back.

    On their end there’s more going on. It sounds like they charged you for an item they knowingly did not ship then claimed the refund was already in progress when you complained. They also gave you a damaged item and claimed to be unable to refund that, which in most developed countries would be a breach of consumer regulations. This sounds an awful lot like that company is attempting to scam people.




  • Am I misreading this or are their arguments all complete nonsense? From what I can see in the article they have:

    1. They have to allow third-party headphones, i.e. the anti-monopoly policy prevents a monopoly.

    Among the requirements of the DMA is that Apple ensures that headphones made by other brands will work with iPhones. It said this has been a block on it releasing its live translation service in the EU as it allows rival companies to access data from conversations, creating a privacy problem.

    1. Other companies will “twist laws” to prevent competition, i.e. exactly what Apple is trying to do by removing regulation. I don’t see any way to interpret this other than an outright lie, anti-monopoly policies encourage competition.

    Apple said that under the DMA, “instead of competing by innovating, already successful companies are twisting the law to suit their own agendas – to collect more data from EU citizens, or to get Apple’s technology for free”.

    1. Porn exists? I don’t even know what they’re trying to say with this one?

    It said that rules under the act affected the way it provided users access to apps. “Pornography apps are available on iPhone from other marketplaces – apps we’ve never allowed on the App Store because of the risks they create, especially for children,” it said.




  • Sort of, but but really. You’re right that historically the daylight hours set an upper limit on the amount of work that can be done per week for most types of work, but that limit is far higher than 8 hours per day over 5 days. The 40 hour work week is based on unions fighting for a 40 hour work week. If it wasn’t for the unions you’d be working all day every day except Sunday, for religious reasons.

    That might change over the next few decades too, the current fight is for a 4 day work week and studies are showing promising results there.



  • There’s plenty of examples of software doing this right and displaying each language in the selector in that language, it’s hard to say why they’ve localised it here. Most likely they just didn’t consider how the user interacts with that element and localised it the same way they translate everything else, but that could be down to anyone from the developer habitually running everything through localisation to company policy where they couldn’t get an exception for that element.

    You’d have to ask support for whatever software you’re using for more detail, chances are you won’t get anything useful back but if you’re lucky they might fix it.


  • The question reads like an XY problem, they describe DB functions for data structures so unless there’s some specific reason they can’t use a DB that’s the right answer. A “spreadsheet for data structures” describes a relational database.

    But they need rectangular structure. How do they work on tree structures, like OP has asked?

    Relationships. You don’t dump all your data in a single table. Take for instance the following sample JSON:

    JSON
      "users": [
        {
          "id": 1,
          "name": "Alice",
          "email": "alice@example.com",
          "favorites": {
            "games": [
              {
                "title": "The Witcher 3",
                "platforms": [
                  {
                    "name": "PC",
                    "release_year": 2015,
                    "rating": 9.8
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "PS4",
                    "release_year": 2015,
                    "rating": 9.5
                  }
                ],
                "genres": ["RPG", "Action"]
              },
              {
                "title": "Minecraft",
                "platforms": [
                  {
                    "name": "PC",
                    "release_year": 2011,
                    "rating": 9.2
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "Xbox One",
                    "release_year": 2014,
                    "rating": 9.0
                  }
                ],
                "genres": ["Sandbox", "Survival"]
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        {
          "id": 2,
          "name": "Bob",
          "email": "bob@example.com",
          "favorites": {
            "games": [
              {
                "title": "Fortnite",
                "platforms": [
                  {
                    "name": "PC",
                    "release_year": 2017,
                    "rating": 8.6
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "PS5",
                    "release_year": 2020,
                    "rating": 8.5
                  }
                ],
                "genres": ["Battle Royale", "Action"]
              },
              {
                "title": "Rocket League",
                "platforms": [
                  {
                    "name": "PC",
                    "release_year": 2015,
                    "rating": 8.8
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "Switch",
                    "release_year": 2017,
                    "rating": 8.9
                  }
                ],
                "genres": ["Sports", "Action"]
              }
            ]
          }
        }
      ]
    }
    

    You’d structure that in SQL tables something like this:

    Tables

    dbo.users

    user_id name email
    1 Alice alice@example.com
    2 Bob bob@example.com

    dbo.games

    game_id title genre
    1 The Witcher 3 RPG
    2 Minecraft Sandbox
    3 Fortnite Battle Royale
    4 Rocket League Sports

    dbo.favorites

    user_id game_id
    1 1
    1 2
    2 3
    2 4

    dbo.platforms

    platform_id game_id name release_year rating
    1 1 PC 2015 9.8
    2 1 PS4 2015 9.5
    3 2 PC 2011 9.2
    4 2 Xbox One 2014 9.0
    5 3 PC 2017 8.6
    6 3 PS5 2020 8.5
    7 4 PC 2015 8.8
    8 4 Switch 2017 8.9

    The dbo.favorites table handles the many-to-many relationship between users and games; users can have as many favourite games as they want, and multiple users can have the same favourite game. The dbo.platforms handles one-to-many relationships; each record in this table represents a single release, but each game can have multiple releases on different platforms.


  • Usually no, unless I’ve left a reply disagreeing then someone else comes along and downvotes them, makes me look like an ass who downvotes anyone I disagree with. I also check my own comments to see if people agree with me but I’ll keep the comment up either way, if I do change my mind I’d rather leave a new comment or add stuff in an edit.

    It’s not too difficult to bot votes on lemmy so they’re even more pointless than they are on reddit.