I would argue that there are good reasons though, and there should be something on the books for those (hopefully rare, recently less so) cases.

Really normal and healthy behavior from a perfectly functional company.

Brain damage is a hell of a drug

ICE: setting a new standard for police across the country

That was not the order of operations for their grandmother

Fucking finally, a governor who understands their mandate

This isn’t shop porn, this is a shop dick pic.

Get started on that table! And then send us pics.

We like to watch.

I believe it is traditional to do so written in blood in the style of an apocalypse log, dealer’s choice for who’s blood. Make sure it’s disjointed and nearly incomprehensible, but that everything is there.

Bonus points if you print the config files and write your documentation on them after stapling them to the walls

No, they have to base the price on what it costs to order the next shipment, unless they want to just stop carrying ram or you expect them to take on a loan for that. The wholesale market for ram must be fucking wild for a retail store to think they have to post something like that.

18USC115 has some good starting points

Maybe he becomes a Democrat. He never admitted to supporting Project 2025 and friends, and would betray them to serve himself. He doesn’t give a shit as long as he stays in power. Woke Trump 2026.

This would be a top 10 anime betrayals up there with Brutus and Caesar, and I am here for it

Either that, or that kompromat must be wild

Listen here you little shit

Super Dimension Fortress, obviously

https://files.catbox.moe/b7sweb.jpg

Only if we let it be. There’s no technical reason why the origin of a video couldn’t have a signature generated by the capture device, or legally requiring AI models to do the same for any content they generate. Anything without an origin sticker is assumed to be garbage by default. Obviously there would need to be some way to make captures either anonymous or not at the user’s choice, and nation states can evade these things with sufficient effort like they always do, but we could cut a lot of slop out by doing some simple stuff like that.

That’s in california where they have margin to play with. In texas, there’s a lot less wiggle room and some analysis I saw when they were pushing theirs through suggested (based on mid-cycle elections) that the resultant maps were actually going to result in +5 D seats. Treat the above as me making stuff up though because I can’t find that source now :(

Until they’re prepared to threaten military action instead of legal action, nothing will change.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/036/994/He’s_Out_of_line_but_he’s_right.jpg

They’re not content, they’re insistent

https://joel.drapper.me/p/rubygems-takeover/