They basically want free labor.
They basically want free labor.
You can right click the URL bar for sites that support the OpenSearch XML standard. Which I guess is what they wanted to replace it with. But I don’t really know why they removed the button to a about: config setting. Could at least be a checkbox or something to enable.
Returns the add custom search engine button. Which for some reason, has been hidden by default.
Depends on the continuity and who’s writing it, but often yes. He was notably portrayed this way in the Justice League cartoon.
Even the smell of Olives causes me to gag. I absolutely cannot eat them. Olive oil is fine. But actual olives, no. Doesn’t matter if they’re old, new, canned, fresh. They’re absolutely disgusting. One of the few foods I outright cannot and will not eat.
Doesn’t gnome already have this?
Lol. Git itself can act as a server over the git protocol. Might have been easier 🤪
There’s plenty of git forges that aren’t GitHub. Git itself has nothing to do with central servers and can theoretically be used in a completely decentralized manner.
I use a Misskey fork for micro blogging and I can’t even get Lemmy posts to load. The profiles of communities do, but that’s it.
Ah right. What I really meant to ask was if it can do protocols other than http.
Which I don’t think it can…
Are you able to tunnel ports other than 80 and 443 through Cloudflare?
It’s not about that. It’s about targeting minorities, history they don’t like, etc.
Right. I agree.
You mean the part about people citing laws like GDPR is dead on?
Definitely a good way to do it. Photoprism supports uploading to WebDAV for sharing. Could front a CDN upload with a web dav server 🤔
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. I am using photoprism for photo management. It doesn’t really support S3 or any CDN. You could use a fuse filesystem or something, but it’s very slow.
Where are you uploading galleries? Just your own HDD connected to a static website?
The fork was originally created because upstream NewPipe elected not to include sponsor block functionality.
Not necessarily. While of course in many many cases, open source is a volunteer effort, there’s usually some implicit transaction going on. Whether that’s improving the software for yourself and passing that on to others, being a business and improving a library or something you use that helps your project generate revenue, or even a straight up commercial transaction.
But in all these cases, the open source project can be taken by you (or others) and you can do whatever you want with it. In the case of Winamp here, you cannot do any of that. It would be different if they were paying for contributions. But they’re not, so.