• laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    …aaaand I will never switch to Windows 11.

    But then, I’m a hypocrite, because I have to create an account to use Android.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Forced accounts are evil - including Android. Here’s my Android story:

      When I got my first Android phone, my intention was to not have an account - or at least have as much isolation between any account and my actual usage as possible. So I decline account creation when I first started using the phone, and told the phone to only store all contacts locally. That worked, and I was pretty happy with it. But later, I wanted to download a couple of basic apps from the app store - and that required an account. So I created a bogus account to download the apps. …

      After creating the account to download stuff, I noticed that the contacts had automatically associated themselves with that new account had automatically uploaded all my contacts and personal info to google to sync with this account. This is precisely the thing I was trying to avoid in the first place. So, I immediately logged into that account via google’s website and told it to not store any contact info, and to delete all existing info. Which it did.

      But then some time later… the account again decided to sync with my phone - this time to delete all the contacts from my phone (presumably because I’d deleted them from the online account). So although I’d gone to some deliberate lengths to tell my phone to only store data locally and to not upload it, what i ended up with was all personal data uploaded, and then purged from my phone. I had to try to restore my contacts from an ancient sim-card backup from my old phone.

      Since then, I’ve decided that I will not use a google account for my phone for any reason, ever. I’ve use F-droid and the Aurora store instead. (But actually I very rarely use any apps anyway.)

    • mal3oon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      because I have to create an account to use Android…

      You don’t. Look into degoogled ROMs, MicroG, Aurora store, and f-droid.

      • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh sure, sure. My point is that Google asked for the same thing as MS, and I mindlessly gave it to them.

        I’ll look into degoogling at some point.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          One difference is there was already value with having a gmail account. What’s the point of getting a Microsoft account? The only thing I can see is it makes settings set up/transfer easy between PCs and for reinstalls.

          Except, if I’m reinstalling, I can’t imagine waiting to copy settings since one of those settings is probably causing a problem and I don’t want it to be automatically set for me. I also don’t use the Microsoft store so…

          Does anyone else actually get value from their Microsoft account? If not, It just feels like it’s only purpose is giving them (more) access to your computer. Why would anyone want that?

  • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    On a new install, before powering up, make sure you don’t start it up with Ethernet plugged in, when you get to the Wi-Fi connection stage hit Ctrl+f10

    Type in

    oobe\bypassnro

    And press enter. The computer will restart and now when you get to the Wi-Fi connection screen you’ll have a like that says “I don’t have internet”.

          • Olifant@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s not a simple one to one. Everyone’s use case and experience is different. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all in on the FOSS train and I don’t approve of Microsoft’s direction with Windows but it’s still a consistently hassle-free experience compared to Linux for people who just don’t wanna deal with distros, terminals, repositories or compatibility layers.

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Always online with kernel-level anti-cheat has a tendency to not work, but that is probably a red flag since there are thousands of different games you can play that don’t snoop around ring-0

        • Wave@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Try emailing manufacturers and asking if they already have support, if they dont request that they start or you won’t consider their parts for your next build. Your wallet is a powerful tool that can cause companies to bend to your will if you know how to use it.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    lack of local accounting means its no longer your operating system, youre now using a perpetually required service from microsoft.

    the walled garden is putting the last bricks in place. hope all you windows fans are …happy… asking apple microsoft for permission to use your own hardware.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      We would have that freedom with Android too if those stupid banking apps stopped trying to dictate what you can run on your hardware & Google giving them more features to do so.

      • hlqxz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is awfully deep. We live in a society.

        <BOTTOM TEXT>

      • Onihikage@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        I switched to Bazzite not long after the Recall AI announcement, shrinking my Windows partition to leave it for just VR stuff which currently doesn’t work well outside of Windows, at least on my system. It’s pretty great! Not perfect, but the problems I have on Bazzite are similar enough in quantity and degree to problems I had on Windows that I’ve basically switched out one set of weird OS quirks for another. The big difference is now I don’t have to think about the OS being disrespectful corporate spyware.

          • Onihikage@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not that I know of; Bazzite is completely based on Fedora Atomic Desktops, which are an immutable type of distro that makes the core OS a read-only image that all gets updated separately from system apps. The Ubuntu equivalent of Fedora Atomic Desktops is Ubuntu Core, but I don’t know if Bazzite has a Ubuntu Core-based equivalent. Bazzite is released by a group called Universal Blue, which makes prepackaged OS builds based on Fedora Atomic Desktops, with particular focus areas. Bazzite focuses on including all gaming-related tweaks, apps, configs, and optimizations out of the box, Aurora focuses on general desktop PC functionality, and Bluefin focuses on productivity, but in the end they’re all Atomic/Immutable distros based on Fedora. It’s worth poking through it all and picking one that best suits your needs.

            • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              What parts of the immutable OS are read only? Like filesystem wise? I’m not sure I really get it.

              • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The basic of immutable desktops is that every system file (what’s outside your home directory (folder) ) is readonly, you can install apps through the app store.

                But I’d say Linux mint (a Non-immutable) distro is what you should try first, because it’s more user-friendly and easier to get help for.

                • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Oh I’ve been using Linux for over 20 years. That’s not an issue.

                  I have a better idea now of what an immutable distro is thanks to your explanation. I don’t know if that’s what I would want after all.

                  I think I prefer the freedom of being able to modify my system files and configs as I need to customize my system as I see fit, even if it meansb potentially breaking something.

      • exscape@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can still block it easily with the command prompt (Shift+F10 during the install) as mentioned. But don’t let that stop you from switching to Linux if you feel like it.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      hope all you windows fans are …happy… asking apple microsoft for permission to use your own hardware.

      It’s been this way for decades, really. Apple, Google, MS, etc. Even if they let you use it without an account, they’ll literally never stop pressuring you and annoying you into signing into an account.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Apple doesn’t actually make it at all difficult to use a Mac or iOS device without an Apple account. You’re asked once during setup and that’s it. At most there’ll be a red dot in Settings>iCloud.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          They do, actually. There’s a bunch of first party software you can’t remove, perpetual notifications you can’t clear about setting up iCloud, etc.

          • psvrh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            There’s one notice, and it’s in the System Settings app. And it’s a little red dot beside the iCloud section. That’s not really the same league as what Microsoft is doing, or Even Google’s nag to use Chrome across all their Web properties.

            You’re right about the first-party apps that you can’t remove, but it’s also not the same as, eg, Edge where those apps are used constantly and your preferences are reset on every update.

            On my Mac I set my browser to Firefox in 2018. It’s never reverted to Safari, not once, where Windows really wants me to use Edge and goes so far as to not just reset it periodically, but also direct start menu searches and in-app web links to an ms-edge: url instead of using the http handler.

            Apple has problems, but this isn’t one of them.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              That’s not really the same league as what Microsoft is doing

              I didn’t say it was. It is intentionally and perpetually annoying, nonetheless.

        • Auzy@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can’t use a lot of apps without it

          So sure you can, but it isn’t an awesome experience

      • tektite@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        But apparently you DO need an Apple ID to access an Apple Notes file that was shared to your Android by your crazy ex who doesn’t know that without an iPhone you won’t be able to read their undoubtedly unhinged, rambling guilt trip. Thanks Apple!

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sure it could, but I think Apple makes so much on overcharging for the machine itself they don’t need to be so aggressive over data collection just logically.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Sadly I think they have to aim to do both, to make the most money as a publically traded company.

            Last I heard Apple was protecting it’s users from Facebook collecting their data… by being the ones who collect it instead. Maybe that not quite right as I don’t listen to news on Apple (outside of their opposition to right to repair).

  • ofcourse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Wouldn’t it be possible to buy a new PC, open the box, and return it right after because you cannot set it up without internet?

    If enough people do it, may be PC manufacturers will force Microsoft to add offline setups.

    • Wave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Louis Rossman type energy. I like it let’s do it. Windows refund day 2 baby

    • SecureTaco@lemmy.asc6.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 months ago

      Funny you say that, setting it up without internet is one of the few ways left to still be able to create a local account.

      • ofcourse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        If I understand correctly from the article, you have to enter ‘OOBE\BYPASSNRO’ in command prompt during installation to prevent it from asking to connect to internet. If that’s the only way to set up a local account, that’s hardly an accessible option.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s no clear path from getting the computer out of the box just setting it up without internet. If you call the manufacturer and they know what the hell they’re doing they’ll walk you through doing the OOBE no internet fix. It just needs to be an option in the damn operating system. The fact that they’re hiding it from you is unconscionable.

      • Mio@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It was not an option one week ago when i tested it. Maybe because I was in WiFi range and Microsoft assumed you have to know the password to at least one of them to pass the wifi screen. No skip button. But could create a new account as unverified using gmail address.

  • pizzaboi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m assuming one would still be able to switch to a local account after installation, but you really shouldn’t need to. What a shit show.

  • REdOG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 months ago

    Use shift f10 and edit the registry… They aren’t disabling that until they have a better solution for autopilot.

    May not work for home editions…

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Tried that on the last install i had to do. Doesnt always anymore. Task manager was hidden by the setup a few times when i did that :(

      I ended up using rufus to patch iso pre-extraction hehe :)

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Back in the day, using Windows was essentially a long series of fucking around with configurations and trying different workarounds to get things to “go”. The actual using of the computer was, in a way, secondary.

    Nothing has changed. Many many years ago I bought a used Apple to try it out and was just - astounded at how little I needed to mess with things to get them to do what I wanted. It was all in settings. That’s it.

    Watching Microsoft leap headfirst into full evil is just like watching the seasons change.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Previously the fucking around was drivers, HAL, compatibility etc. now it’s a goddamn delousing

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The amount of time I’ve spent getting my MacOS to not be annoying… it’s such a shit experience compared to Gnome/Linux. Every single day I use MacOS, I find a new annoying inconsistency, or either poor or directly bad UX design decision or implementation.

      Next time I look for a place to work, I’d consider Windows or MacOS to require at least 30% higher salary to be worth the annoyance.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So you’ve obviously never had to use defaults write com.apple.stupidpreference.fix bool true

      Apple has a lot less nonsense than Microsoft, but the amount of nonsense is greater than zero. What’s really annoying (on their mobile platform specifically) is when certain problems occur on iOS that would have been completely solvable on MacOS with a command line tool, but you have to erase the phone because Apple doesn’t give you access to the OS.

      MacOS is already deprecating the Keychain access tool, which will obfuscate more of the OS security from the user and make it more iOS-like in trying to fix failures.

      Apple is enshittifying in absence of Jobs, they’re just behind Microsoft by one or two decades.

    • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just burn the ISO to a USB drive with Rufus, a window full of options with check boxes will pop up, with a lot of options to turn installation bullshit.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hm. So are we all the way there to Win 11 not being installable in fully offline machines, or…? Because niche as that application is, it does sound like the start of a use case for a natively compatible Windows alternative from a third party (say, a FreeWin to go with FreeDOS). I know there are or have been some attempts, but… yeah, long term that seems like it would prompt more focus on something like that.

    I suppose it’s more likely that compatibility layers in other OSs would get there first and more practically, but still. Maybe it’s time to move Windows applications from an ecosystem to a standard.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      The year of the ReactOS desktop?

      On a serious note, I suspect the IOT version doesn’t have this requirement.

    • darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Linux with wine/proton already works pretty good for running Windows programs and games outside of Windows.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m sure enterprise editions have to allow it in some capacity. There will always be businesses that will use Windows on machines not exposed to the Internet.

      With that said, this is some BS. And MS I don’t want to hear the argument that smartphone vendors do it. They shouldn’t require an account either.

    • zod000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The W11 installer sadly doesn’t allow that anymore with the current versions. If you have that older installer, keep it safely archived.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      A few months back I installed home edition and this workaround did not work. The installer would not allow me to proceed until it could verify with Microsoft.

    • Llamajockey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just used this bypass 2 days ago. I’d recommend people download the current W11 installer so that the work around always works as long as you keep the device away from Internet until the OS is installed