• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If I have to see this false prophet Lichtman’s bowl cut one more time, I swear to god… Here are just a few facts about this asshole:

    • It’s really not some miracle that he got these elections right, considering he waits until last-minute to predict them.
    • He gave a full-throated endorsement of Hillary Clinton… only to predict she’d lose later on in the race.
    • He hasn’t given his fucking prediction for THIS cycle yet.
    • Even based on his own “keys,” he is not remaining impartial because he has no idea whether an alternative candidate would get all the keys just the same.
    • He inflates incumbency despite Biden’s 37% approval-rating and losing pre and post-first debate in polls… Which if you look at historical trends, that NEVER bodes well for the incumbent.

    By the way I emailed this shithead challenging his methodology (and I remained much more neutral than this) to no response. In fact I wouldn’t be the least-bit surprised if the only reason he wants Biden to remain the nominee is to ensure he maintains record for election predictions by later predicting his easy defeat.

    Nate Silver has a far more predictive, mathematical model than this dumb fuck. He can Lichtma balls. (ok that last one I just had to out of adolescent gallows humor, but he threw the first punch with name-calling those wanting Biden to step down).

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      We are long past the point where it would have been feasible for Biden to withdraw. We were past that point well before the first debate. It is too late to get somebody else on the ballot in many states, including states that then Dems potentially need, like Nevada.

      Anybody still repeating the line that Biden needs to withdraw is either:

      1. Ignorant of how election law works

      2. A bad actor, pushing right wing/Russian talking points.

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Polls are massively inaccurate. Not just because of some sigma six level quantitative analysis, but because of the methodology.

          People 45 and under don’t answer the phone. When my phone rings I immediately block the person forever unless it’s a contact as do most people that are millennials and younger. So pollsters rely on who answers the phone, which is usually angry grandpa.

      • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed. It’s too late to promote some lesser known candidate enough to compete with the frothing rotten cult of personality stench that surrounds the orange rapist.

      • kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can argue that it’s not a good idea for Biden to withdraw. That doesnt make people who think the opposite either Russian operatives or ignorant of election law. It just does not.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        lol says who? I can name Senators, US House representatives, senior strategists for Obama, even a former DNC Chair who fucking say otherwise. Don’t bullshit me.

        You’re not just wrong, you may very well be outright lying. Now show me your evidence or walk away.

      • HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        A long shot is better than no shot; but I suspect a bad actor pushing Russian talking points such as yourself does know this.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes, it actually does.

        That’s kind of — you know — the point.

        Your response is like literally finger-in-ear, head-in-sand denial.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You haven’t seen the press eat up every other utterance from Trump’s mouth in the past 8 years? They report on every little thing he does because it creates ratings and clicks.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well now it’s funny because I hear both arguments simultaneously:

            • “Why are we talking about Biden when we SHOULD be talking about Trump!?”

            • “Why is the media giving Trump so much attention!?!?”

            Regardless I’m less concerned about the past because that’s written in stone, and I’m more concerned about the future that is still mutable.

            • Kiernian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago
              • “Why are we talking about Biden when we SHOULD be talking about Trump!?”

              What I mean when I utter something like this is: “why are we laser-focused on a few of Biden’s relatively minor (IN COMPARISON) gaffes/mistakes/issues/flaws when the laundry list of shit that’s bad about Trump is TWO ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE LARGER?”

              If you count up every bad thing Trump has done that would be on looping repeat on fox news for weeks if Biden or Obama said/did it, you’d hit five digits before you got back to Trump talking about grabbing women by the pussy. It’s fucking LUDICROUSLY one-sided. And non-fox stations are not much better. Think about it.

              • "Why is the media giving Trump so much attention!?!

              So much POSITIVE attention.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I am in complete agreement with your analysis here. I fully agree there is a double-standard of expectations, and quite frankly has been, for well over 2 decades.

                The question is: what do we do about it?

                I watched every single day of the live coverage of the January 6th Hearings that went on throughout the summer of 2022. I watched the Impeachment hearings. I watched the Charlottesville reactions. I watched all the coverage of the criminal indictments and the criminal conviction. I’ve seen quite a bit on Project 2025 long before Biden’s catastrophic debate. The problem is: truly, nothing is sticking. Why? Because right-wing media largely controls the narrative in this country, both thanks to the injection of billionaire money and corporations, but just the prevalence of unabashed conservative media, ranging from church and AM talk radio to Fox News on in every breakroom and doctor’s office waiting-room in the country. They muddy the waters so effectively that no matter how loudly we point to these problems, they have talking-point to deflect, downplay, or muddy the waters of reality… And uninformed gullible apathetic voters lap that shit up.

                The only thing we can really do is not make it easy for them. We can’t give them an argument that actually has legitimate substance to it, like Biden’s age and cognitive capacity. Look, to me the data is clear: 75% of Americans don’t think Biden is fit to run again, and that Democrats would have better odds at defeating Trump with someone else. I’m in agreement. Every single data point I can find signals Trump sweeping the election. Mostly because the guy who supposedly holds the moral high ground can’t shake his ego and step down for the greater good.

                • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I am in complete agreement with your analysis here. I fully agree there is a double-standard of expectations, and quite frankly has been, for well over 2 decades.

                  Good to know you do agree with Lichtman after all.

                  • lennybird@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Now that’s an awfully cute strawman fallacy you’ve got there, buddy, but no that does not mean I buy the premise that asshole is saying in this article.

                    Will you listen if I explain why?