This stupid topic again

But sure

    • Seraph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      You legitimately think the Democratic party will get behind any of these nominations enough to defeat Trump? I’d say most are considered more controversial than fuckin Hillary was.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I legitimately think that this was what you intended to reply with regardless of what I said, and I very much doubt you actually bothered to read it.

        • Seraph@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Incorrect, I actually looked up both Kelly’s and Duckworth’s backgrounds as I wasn’t familiar - I see why they were first!

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Seriously. This is a pretty mild list of semi-proven politicians with national recognition. Warren (or maybe Franken) are the only ones I can see being potentially controversial and even they’re both still broadly liked within the party.

          Also, how does someone who’s not familiar with Kelly or Duckworth have a strong opinion about who’s controversial in the Democratic party? They’re not superstars, but you weren’t exactly digging up no-names.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            It is extremely notable to me that the “get rid of Biden” is so HUGELY emphasized over “let’s figure out who instead”

            It makes me look suspiciously at what would initially be the pretty sensible idea of subbing in someone younger

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              That continues to be a piss poor rebuttal because the two questions are separate. Many people literally don’t care. And anyone who thinks this is some sort of ratfucking is either detached from reality or doesn’t actually know that many Democrats. The calls to step down (and frankly depression) have been coming from across the party right from the night of the debate. The gaslighting is just the worst possible response to an already bad situation.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You look suspiciously at anything but blind unthinking worship of Biden.

              If you’re gonna call me a bot, come out and say it instead of hiding behind vague language like a coward.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Right. You can no longer call people bots, so you found another unfounded accusation to use because you don’t have defensible positions.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You’re way too intelligent to be a bot, no one ever called you that. That I ever saw, at least.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whitehouse would be solid as well. AOC would also be a fine pick if we got party unity behind her.

      • Crisps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        AOC would be a better VP pick than top of the ticket. Let her ascend later when she is more experienced.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        AOC could unify the party behind her, but she’d need to do it with a primary. The Biden delegates and/or the party establishment aren’t going to make a wild swing-for-the-fences play like that with an appointment.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t disagree. I think she’d be an excellent choice and absolutely trounce Trump but it’d be a hard fucking sell to the DNC.

          She’s got more name recognition than Harris though so the “Harris is the only one voters would recognize” bunch can get fucked.