• toasterOven@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Hold the debate anyway. Have Kamala appear next to an empty chair.

    Moderator: giving Trump a couple more minutes to appear.

    (~5 min later)

    Moderator: Trump is a no show. Hmm… he originally eagerly agreed to this September debate with Biden. It’s unclear why the change of heart, but I have to say he forfeits by default.

    Kamala (interrupts): Hold on, please call Trump’s probation officer to verify his attendance permission while we wait a few more min. He’s understandably a bit skiddish with prosecutors lately but I would like to yield some of my time & do him this courtesy since he donated to my campaign in 2011 & 2013.

    (~5 min later)

    Moderator: no go, but would you like to answer the questions next to an empty chair to have your answers heard anyway?

    Kamala: yes, this way he can take all the time he needs to prepare a scripted response later given his cognitive challenges….

      • toasterOven@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        NY Times is a closed website. Paywalled or something? I could not reach it from Tor at least not with my browser. Could be a popup-blocker blocker, not sure. Anyway, the link I gave is a NY Times front-end that is openly accessible, though clearnet users might have to append a .cab or something. There are probably NY Times FEs on clearnet but I don’t know of any ATM.

        (edit) actually I think that’s NY Times official onion server. Anyway, for whatever reason it has better accessibility than the clearnet version.

  • toasterOven@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ha! I predicted this!

    I also predicted Biden’s disaster and asked people around me why the fuck is Biden going to debate Trump. People said “he has no choice”. I found that quite questionable. Now Trump seems to be proving that candidates have a choice.

    Sure Trump’s cowardice will damage his campaign. But getting an ass-beating in the debate is even more damaging, as Biden proved. So Trump is making his best tactical move for his ability.

    (edit)
    I would like it if the headlines were “Trump forfeits the debate” to rightfully emphasize the lossy nature of the decision.

      • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I can! As long as people continue coming to message forums complaining instead of passionately making their case, or joining the party and doing something about it, I predict there will be no “global Democratic overhaul”, whatever that means to you.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          What would this involve for foreign policy?

          I’m particularly interested in a few Islamic fascist states with carte blanche to abuse, well, less lucky countries, but too populated by kinda brownish people. And in Israel with the same privilege.

          Do fascists get ignored (they are fine with this, but at least better than support)? Do they get sanctioned (hopes are not high)? Do they get desert-stormed (yes, please, desert-storm Baku)? Or does anything change at all.

          • Machinist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m not at all from where you are.

            Best case, it doesn’t get better for you. Maybe they shoot a little less.

            Keep your head down and take care of your people. I’m sorry. It isn’t right or okay. I’m teaching my son to love people and that’s about all I can do.

            Good luck. Be hard. Take care of your people.

    • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem with the Biden debate situation is that he was trailing in the polls, so he needed a debate with a strong performance in order to win over voters. Obviously, the opposite of that happened.

      Trump’s margin against Kamala is likely smaller, but he’s still slightly ahead. It’s probably much more prudent for him to avoid a debate given that Kamala would probably perform much better than him. He has nothing to gain and everything to lose.

        • Entropywins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          When folk had the tiniest bit of mutual respect for each other and the office, I believe your assumption was correct, but times change.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        There was a time where it was a given that we’d have x number of Presidential debates… I can’t believe how far we’ve sunk.

        • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Normally you don’t have a debate against an Alzheimer patient from a party that denied how bad it was for years. Remember when his senility was fake news, like…3 weeks ago? Exact same arrogant bastards are risking a trump victory again while they play their stupid games. Harris is looking coronated, same as Biden and Hillary before. That they don’t have a real open primary is pathetic. The one party state yall say you want to prevent arrived ten years ago, now you’re just the north american equivalent of Jackie Chan supporting the communist party. Yknow they vote for left and right factions inside the overarching party there, right? People vote with a choice of conservative communist member or liberal communist member, they all belong to a second party under the main one.

          • Machinist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Holy fuck. If you’re still human and waking up in the morning, you’re real sick. You might be ai.

            • toasterOven@eviltoast.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I must say he’s right about one thing: the US is a one-party system.

              Or more specifically I would say the US is a two-party system for white men (+Kanye West) and a one-party system for everyone else.

            • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Lol. Nice try. I realize you can’t argue the points, but playing dumb is really, really obvious. Better to say nothing and all

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        He’s dropping in the polls, especially against her. Maybe some people are too young to remember, but candidates usually gain like 10% in the polls after a failed assassination. Or 5% after the convention. And their Vice Presidential Candidate gains after the convention too.

        Trump literally had no assassination or convention bump. His ceiling is less than 50% of voters. Kamala Harris has seen a large bump just from jumping into the race. Some swing state polls went from +8 or +10 trump earlier this year, to only +2 against Kamala.

        She’s only made one speech as the potential candidate! Believe me, she’s going to be on top by the day of the debate.

        • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, I hope her momentum continues to grow and that she snaps up the undecided vote as people become more familiar with her.

          But at that point, the question becomes whether she needs to debate. The Pod Save guys were saying that if she’s ahead in the blue wall states by September it might be the smarter move to stay on the campaign trail and deny Trump the national airtime.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sure Trump’s cowardice will damage his campaign.

      Press X to doubt.

      Nothing damages this guy when it comes to his cult. He could go on stage and start sobbing like a child if he bumps his toe on the podium and the propagandists on Fox and the like will just say Democrats set it up to hit him and put pepper spray on the podium or something.

      In this case it won’t be cowardice, it will be a “totally reasonable” bullshit argument as to why it isn’t proper to do and they’ll all pat themselves on the back for being “above shitty politics” while beating up Kamala for wanting to debate “out of turn.”

  • 4lan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Felon, pedophile, rapist, coward.

    There are so many ways to describe this man

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    245
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Brave Sir Donald ran away.

    Bravely ran away away.

    When danger reared it’s ugly head,

    He bravely turned his tail and fled.

    Yes, brave Sir Donald turned about

    And gallantly he chickened out.

    Gingerly taking to his feet,

    He beat a very brave retreat.

    Bravest of the brave, Sir Donald!

  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So… Biden wasn’t the nominee yet but he did a debate. Harris isn’t the nominee yet but… What?

    This is hilarious. Will this help more than going into a debate? Likely not, but they will have to do one after a nomination, right?

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The well-documented cowardice of this geriatric and demented rapist insurrectionist.

  • Dagamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If your platform and policy are good, you can debate anyone at any time. If your platform is just “other guy bad” then you’re gonna have a hard time.

    • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, same with the “Democrat party” dog whistle, and randomly throwing around the word “Marxist”. His whole campaign is just memes and buzzwords.

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The dumbest take my racists family friends use is the tired DemocRAT. Oh so clever.

        I’m just glad we never have to hear Let’s Go Brandon ever again.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    He is afraid of strong, smart women. He is afraid of people who can laugh. And he is deadly afraid of ending up losing the debate and the vote to a black woman, the kind of person that should in his mind be as inferior as a bug.