A biased fact checking bot should not be allowed to operate in a public forum, giving weight to it’s opinions as though it were a neutral source of truth.
If you want its services, you can go to their website and use it. It shouldn’t be here.
Report it to the mods, if they consider it is providing “low-effort comments” (Rule 5) then they can block the bot from the community. Else you can block on your own user level.
So block it
No. I’ll deal with it in the way that seems appropriate for the moment.
That’s not sufficient.
A biased fact checking bot should not be allowed to operate in a public forum, giving weight to it’s opinions as though it were a neutral source of truth.
If you want its services, you can go to their website and use it. It shouldn’t be here.
Report it to the mods, if they consider it is providing “low-effort comments” (Rule 5) then they can block the bot from the community. Else you can block on your own user level.
Blocking it at the user level effectively amplifies it, because then he doesn’t see and downvote it any longer.
i vote to keep the bot, for no other reason than that dude’s butthurt about it
I think you’ve inadvertently demonstrated the problem with calling out media “bias”.
I would be interested to lean what, if anything, you’d say meets this description.
Only my uncle’s drunken retelling of events he half heard on Newsmax are true!!1!!11!!!ONE!
Good news! You can start your own instance! With black jack and hookers!