• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    25 days ago

    This feels like a very foolish move. I do not know the relevant law at all, but surely it’s some kind of illegal to falsely use someone’s face to claim their political endorsement? And it’s not like Taylor Swift is somehow lacking in either the financial clout to sue over it or the PR clout to turn it around

    If this fucking walloper wants to ruin his own campaign then that’s more than fine by me. I’m just surprised by what seems like such an obviously poor move

    • g0zer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      25 days ago

      Honestly, poor political moves seem to be all the man is capable of. And his base (unfortunately) always seems to have just enough cognitive dissonance to eat it up and pivot/shift the goalposts.

      More and more, I come to the conclusion that the only way forward is to stop fighting them, and instead focus on strengthening us.

      The one thing MAGA republicans have in spades is a sense of unity and community, which is something we on the left need to foster (instead of infighting and segmentation).

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      25 days ago

      That’s his superpower. No matter how low your opinion of him gets he can always find a way to surprise you with how shitty he can be.

    • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      25 days ago

      If I was an attorney for Taylor Swift, I might argue that the campaign needs to have their assets frozen because who knows what other fraudulent or illegal activity the campaign could be engaging in. Guys like trump do this type of thing because their expectation is that they’ll get away with it.

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      25 days ago

      All true but there is likely a portion of his base who follows nothing regarding Taylor Swift, only passively knowing who she is.

      (That’s me, and I’m not part of his base. I give zero fucks about Taylor Swift. Everything I know about her is through passive acquisition.)

      They’re not going to care enough about her to hear the retraction. If anything it’ll be some vague thought that even liberal star elites like their guy with no follow up.

    • smokebuddy [he/him]@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      From what I understand, Taylor Swift was offered big time FTX money but her parents are competent legal professionals who reviewed the contract, recognized that SBF was selling dangerous unregistered securities, and advised to stay the fuck away from that shit. I think she may have been the only celebrity who avoided that dump truck of money to protect her fans and her brand.

      Not someone I’d fuck around with. (also remember when Evermore theme park tried suing lol)