• BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, stupid teenage boys will spend what money they have to hang out with their friends… So, it’s a viable audience.

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      His stuff at least manages to make money somehow, so that makes some kind of sense from a money worship point of view. I doubt Blomkamp’s movies raked in as much cash though.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, that’s another that makes no sense to me. People largely dislike all his recent works. “Let’s give him a huge budget for a two part star wars fan fic!”

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Snyder has an amazing eye for action. Sucker Punch, 300, and Watchmen were all amazing visual/auditory feasts. Everything else about his movies is just average to below average, though.

        Giving him a Star Wars makes perfect sense when you consider what Disney thinks of the Star Wars audience. “Just give them laser sword and space ships and explosions and they’ll be happy.”

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Blokamp is great at effects and story ideas, he’s not a good director. Even District 9 is a bit of a directorial mess but there’s enough interesting story there to overcome that. The rest of his films? Not so much.

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I personally wouldn’t put him above Snyder in the visuals category, but I respect your opinion and I don’t think you’re way off or anything. I can see having that preference.