Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-215 days agoStarlink is refusing to comply with Brazil's X ban (Update: Starlink will comply)www.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square232fedilinkarrow-up1769arrow-down115
arrow-up1754arrow-down1external-linkStarlink is refusing to comply with Brazil's X ban (Update: Starlink will comply)www.engadget.comGhostalmedia@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-215 days agomessage-square232fedilink
minus-squaredb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57·16 days agoControlled by governments or controlled by corpos and the super rich? I say there’s hardly an improvement.
minus-squareRichard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·16 days agoNo, but through the existence of both options, you can get more plurality than by using one individual option.
minus-squarezbyte64@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·16 days agoIf we’re talking about corporations I can only assume you mean options in how to get fucked.
minus-squareOccamsRazer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·16 days agoGovernment can throw you in jail.
minus-squaredustyData@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 days agoHave you heard about this corporation called the church of Latter Day Saints?
minus-squaredb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·16 days agoCorporate throws you on the street to starve.
minus-squareOccamsRazer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agoThey tried that with me once, but I showed them and got a different job.
minus-squaredb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agoYou got another one job at the the other starlink? There’s a reason the system requires a certain percentage of unemployment to keep working. There’s also a reason there’s homeless people and children living in flood security.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·16 days agoYeah, cables or radio waves, it’s the same thing in the end. What we need (IMO) is another layer on top if the classic internet with encryption and hookers.
minus-squarerkeene@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days agoThis is what IPSec OE was created to solve, but nobody uses it – instead using things like TLS, which also provides protocol aware non-repudiation.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-216 days agoOr Tenfingers (my network protocol for decentralised web pages and data) ofc 😌
Controlled by governments or controlled by corpos and the super rich? I say there’s hardly an improvement.
No, but through the existence of both options, you can get more plurality than by using one individual option.
If we’re talking about corporations I can only assume you mean options in how to get fucked.
Government can throw you in jail.
Have you heard about this corporation called the church of Latter Day Saints?
Corporate throws you on the street to starve.
They tried that with me once, but I showed them and got a different job.
You got another one job at the the other starlink?
There’s a reason the system requires a certain percentage of unemployment to keep working. There’s also a reason there’s homeless people and children living in flood security.
Yeah, cables or radio waves, it’s the same thing in the end.
What we need (IMO) is another layer on top if the classic internet with encryption and hookers.
This is what IPSec OE was created to solve, but nobody uses it – instead using things like TLS, which also provides protocol aware non-repudiation.
Like i2p or TOR?
Or Tenfingers (my network protocol for decentralised web pages and data) ofc 😌